Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g59IoqC02340; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 14:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 14:50:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <7CDB5C60-7BD9-11D6-A2A3-0003936786B0@global2000.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Kate Gladstone <kate@global2000.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:828] question on the part that memory plays in literacy-instruction
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 662
Lines: 18
Dear experts - as you see things, does memory play any part in literacy-instruction?
We all know, of course, to avoid *rote* memorization (memorization
of info that the person doesn't even understand), but does any place exist
for *non-rote* memorization (memorization of info that the person *does* understand)
?
Yours for better letters,
Kate Gladstone - Handwriting Repair
kate@global2000.net
http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair
325 South Manning Boulevard
Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA
telephone 518/482-6763
AND REMEMBER ...
you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I
get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:08 EST