[NIFL-POVRACELIT:922] RE: who speaks and what is said and not said

From: tjjhjr@netscape.net
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 08:15:11 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g93CFBX22569; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <755D8003.73D41068.0006CB3C@netscape.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: tjjhjr@netscape.net
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:922] RE: who speaks and what is said and not said
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 2213
Lines: 55

wasn't it interesting to hear that someone else feels that the lists from cal are not addressing the issues

so if they kicked me out of nifl-esl.....why won't they respond to my request for a call back or a face to face.....guess they will have to explain to my congresssman how my tax dollars won't let me participate 

thank you for your comments








"George E. Demetrion" <sophocles5@juno.com> wrote:

>
>On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:59:53 -0400 (EDT) "Margarita Oliver"
><pegtoliver@earthlink.net> writes:
>
>>  I, too, find that the NIFL list doesn't address my passionate
>>concerns.  I feel that nobody does, and I can easily hear that you 
>>feel the same way.   Are there other local people who feel as you do?  
>Is 
>>there any "leader" tytpe of person who will speak out?  In my case, I
>don't find 
>>those people, which makes it very difficult.   I'm afraid it's the same
>for 
>>you.
>
>Peg and others,
>
>In principle, the focus of the NIFL lists are open to a range of topics. 
>While there may be certain pressures to focus discussion to certain 
>topics and to avoid or limit the more controversial ones, there is
>nothing prohibiting that as long as one focuses at least broadly on the
>range of topics geared to the general purpose of the list.  This list in
>particular is open to a wide range of provocative discussion.  Whether
>listmembers choose to take on unpopular or controversial topics within
>the broad frame of the particular purpose of a given list is another
>matter.  To a very extensive extent it's up to listmembers themselves to
>decide upon the range of discussions and the extent to which they choose
>to engage in what might be deemed  controversial matters.  While there
>may be a fair degree of social pressure to keep topics restricted and
>controversy toned down, I don't believe that such is a mandate from the
>list managers.  But, I could be wrong.
>
>George Demetrion
>sophocles5@aol.com
>
>

__________________________________________________________________
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:11 EST