Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g93Nd3X19744; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:39:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:39:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <64F56E6C.5F0C75E6.0006CB3C@netscape.net> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: tjjhjr@netscape.net To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:927] RE: Topics X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 2705 Lines: 52 really...........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!it is so interesting to see the same names coming to the plate on this list too to silence any questions they do not like..............i am sure they will enjoy another removal.......but then....since no one is answering.....those concerns......why not let them die a natural death......why bother to remove the heretic....if it is that way.........or is it a crusade to evict anyone who is new with fresh questions for the entrenched.........and i thought what that person wrote from tampa was nice...........and i feel really bad seeing this response again...from the same person Ujwala Samant <usamant@comcast.net> wrote: >I have been reading the concerns (complaints) on this listserv that people >find their issues not being addressed. I can understand that being the case, >given how widespread and diverse the field is. There are people who say they >were taken off other lists and do not say why nor what really happened. >After a while, these come across as petulant raves, not as reasonable >arguments. There are people who say their concerns aren't addressed. And we >blame the list moderators for everything. > >Well the listserv discussions are not generated by the moderators. Let's >face the fact that it is the participants who generate and maintain the >discussions on any listserv. If there are not enough discussants interested >in the theme you're talking about, how is that the fault of the listserv or >the moderator? As far as I know, this is a free listserv, and anybody can >join it, as our colleagues from the UK and Turkey and Australia have shown. >I think perhaps there aren't enough people on the list who share everyone's >interests. I find that a number of my interests aren't met here, or the >EUSOL listserv nor the Women listserv. I go elsewhere for them. Can't blame >the facilitators for people's lack of interest in international issues, or >PAR or........ > >On the other hand, here's a link that made me nervous and links to the >previous message by kmccook: > >http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=03web.h22 > >Take a look at what is happening to our databases amongst other things. >There is also a directive which is gently persuading school districts >towards the exclusive use of phonics in the teaching of reading. > >http://www.education.umn.edu/research/testing-editorial.htm > > >regards >Ujwala Samant >(NCSALL-Rutgers University) > > > __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:11 EST