[NIFL-POVRACELIT:1162] RE: : [NIFL-AALPD:497] NIFL discussion censorship

From: Taylor Willingham (taylor@austin-pacific.com)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 16:22:23 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h63KMNC00771; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:22:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:22:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <016d01c341a0$79b47bf0$0300a8c0@Taylor>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Taylor Willingham" <taylor@austin-pacific.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:1162] RE: : [NIFL-AALPD:497] NIFL discussion censorship
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 3749
Lines: 120

My apologies if this has already been addressed and I missed it, but
what happened to the NLA discussion list? I went to the archives to see
what is happening on that list and it seems to have disappeared. Is this
a technological glitch, or was it intentionally removed?

Taylor

Taylor L. Willingham
Austin-Pacific Consulting Co.
P.O. Box 1255
Salado, TX 76571
254.947.3793
866.215.0843 (National Issues Forums)
taylor@austin-pacific.com
www.texasforums.org
 
..Connecting people, ideas and communities...

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-povracelit@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-povracelit@nifl.gov] On
Behalf Of George E. Demetrion
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:1161] : [NIFL-AALPD:497] NIFL discussion
censorship

Apologies for cross-postings.

This message is particularly  relevant for this list in that messsages
about the US Iraqi conflict were systematically eradicted from the
archives.  Perhaps they will be restored.  That is certainly my hope.

George Demetrion
__________

We are writing to express our ongoing concern about lack of transparency
at 
the National Institute for Literacy and lack of clarity about how NIFL
will 
uphold and support the Constitutional rights of discussion participants,
as 
demonstrated by secret filtering and removal of messages from discussion

lists, and subsequent refusal to provide information about these
practices.

In a message posted to all NIFL discussion lists on Friday, May 23rd, 
Interim Director Sandra Baxter wrote:

NIFL is working with the list facilitators to develop clear guidelines
on discussion list policies.  These guidelines will be posted to the
NIFL discussion lists as soon as possible but no later than mid-June
and will be implemented by NIFL staff and list facilitators.

In a message posted to the NIFL-AALPD list May 24th, Eileen Eckert
wrote:
Sandra said: "In response to concerns raised about these messages, NIFL 
implemented automated filters to block advocacy messages as a temporary 
means of ensuring NIFL's compliance with federal law while continuing to

maintain the discussion lists as a resource for the field." Who raised
these 
concerns? Why did NIFL choose to implement "automated filters" as its 
response? Why were there no messages stating the concern that in order
to

comply with federal law, people should not post advocacy messages to the

list? Why were list subscribers not informed that their messages were
being 
"filtered"? What words trigger the filters? When will these "temporary" 
filters be removed? Who will decide? How?

We have been told that the filters were removed, and that is all we have

been told. Messages that were removed from the archives have not been 
restored, guidelines have not been posted, and questions have not been 
answered. We believe that a functioning democracy relies on respect for
the 
Constitution, free and open communication, and transparency in
government, 
and we urge those at NIFL to meet these requirements by taking the
following 
steps:

1. Post discussion guidelines that ensure protection of participants'
First 
Amendment rights.

2. Answer the above questions about the filtering and removal of
messages

from the discussion lists and archives.

3. Restore messages that were blocked or removed from the archives.

Signed,
Eileen Eckert
Catherine B. King
George Demetrion
Steve Bender
Janet Isserlis
Elsa Auerbach
Bonnie Odiorne
Joshua Hayes
Mary Lynn Carver
Ujwala Samant
Maureen Crowley
Janice Sapp
Andy Nash

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--------- End forwarded message ----------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:18:09 EST