[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:112] Techno Tyranny

From: David J Rosen (DJRosen@world.std.com)
Date: Sat Dec 13 1997 - 14:25:42 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost.nifl.gov [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA27400; Sat, 13 Dec 1997 14:25:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 14:25:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.95.971213141748.16336B-100000@world.std.com>
Errors-To: lmann@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: David J Rosen <DJRosen@world.std.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:112] Techno Tyranny
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO

NIFL-Technology colleagues,

I have recently come across an example of an organizational practice that
I would term _technology tyranny_ and I wonder if others on this list have
run into such practices.

A teacher told me that they have a new network of terrific pentiums at
her program which apparently is connected to a Wide Area Network.  Her
program is one of several adult literacy programs sponsored by a city
agency. The WAN/LAN administrator(s) have a policy that no software
may be installed or used on any of the computers unless it is first
approved by a central committee downtown.

What's bad about this?  From a teacher's point of view, it's intimidating,
prevents one from using tools one is familiar/comfortable with, prevents
use of small, creative programs which might only be useful for some
specific purposes in a particular class, discourages teachers' creating
their own software for use with their classes, and.. gives everyone the
the "Big Brother" chills.  One colleague, outraged by this practice,
thinks its analogous to book censorship.

What do you all think about this?  Is this typical where you are?  Is this
not all that unreasonable from your perspective, and if so, why?  Are you
outraged by this?  Why?

David J. Rosen



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 11 2000 - 13:27:05 EST