[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:1000] Re: Looking for an Administrative database

From: KathleenBombach@aol.com
Date: Fri Apr 28 2000 - 10:15:56 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id KAA06948; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 10:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 10:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <7c.4c9021e.263af64d@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: KathleenBombach@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:1000] Re: Looking for an Administrative database
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 104
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 258
Lines: 5

A better investment would be to send the administrative staff to training to 
learn how to use Access.  The other stuff on the market, like Oracle, 
represents a huge investment and sophisticated users, i.e. a big investment 
in training.  
Kathleen Bombach



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:45:29 EST