[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:1756] VIRUS

From: Ann Haney (ahaney@mb.sympatico.ca)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 15:01:08 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f42J17f16028; Wed, 2 May 2001 15:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <00ac01c0d339$f46db140$8a3bc8cd@ann>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Ann Haney" <ahaney@mb.sympatico.ca>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:1756] VIRUS
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: RO
Content-Length: 3701
Lines: 80

Please do not open any attachments sent to you by me! They contain a virus
which sends emails to your address book (I think).   I got this virus from
someone on this list serv yesterday - his computer sent me a message telling
me to check the email and like a fool I clicked on it.
I have cleaned it with McAfee and hopefully that will take care of it. Sorry
for any inconvenience this has caused.
Ann



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathryn DiPietro" <kdipietr@utk.edu>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:02 PM
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:1753] RE: very short content needed for very beg


> This is in response to Virgina's post: "Kathryn I would be interested in
> what you have done in the science area."
>
> For the last few years (this is my third year), I have been working with
> Dr. Claudia Melear here at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville in a
very
> unique course which situates science and elementary educators in a
> naturalistic setting (on Ossabaw Island) for a week. The course is not
only
> unique in that most of the classes are help on island, but there is also a
> technology component which has evolved over the past few years. Initially,
> the focus was on using the technology to support the development of
> multidisciplinary units and lessons. However, after working with these
> teachers, the pre-service teachers in my Instructional Technology course,
> as well as reading related research, the technology component has changed.
> The focus is now on using inquiry-based teaching methods which can be
> supported by a WebQuest. However, one does not have to use a WebQuest to
> use inquiry methods. This focus on constructivist inquiry methods seems to
> be more relevant to the teachers i.e. they want to know how to teach...the
> technology becomes secondary to the teaching. Then when we learn to use a
> web-editor and other software related to creating a WebQuest, they have a
> purpose upfront and learn the tech skills as they create.
>
> I am giving you the URL of  the Ossabaw website so you can take a look at
> it and hope you will check back after this summer so that you can see the
> difference in products taught using a skills based approach (first two
> years) and an approach that focuses on methodology.
>
> http://web.utk.edu/~ctmelear/ossabaw/
>
> Also, let me share with you my course site. To see some of the WebQuests
> that were developed by 1st semester preservice teachers is most impressive
> not because their websites are outstanding, but because the methods they
> use in their webquests make use of some excellent teaching strategies that
> move students to higher cognitive levels. Click on external links and then
> class webquests. Many of these are science related. They are all tied to
> multidisciplinary units.
>
> http://online.utk.edu/courses/52995/       login: guest   password: guest
>
> One more website. For this one you will need the Flash plugin which you
can
> get at http://www.macromedia.com. I have worked with Dr. Counts for the
> past two years employing a very constructivist approach to working with
> grad level students, Again, no focus on teaching the technology
> skills..focus on concepts. The student products are most impressive. Once
> you get there, you may want to look at the Mountains projects, which was a
> concept we developed as a course and linked to the Tennessee State
> Curriculum Frameworks. Most of the students have had no prior experience
> with Flash (which is a very high level piece of software).
>
> http://coe337.coe.utk.edu/itg/kdipietr/interactive2.swf
>
> Thanks for your interest,
> --Kathryn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:31:17 EST