Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id gAQLsuX04243; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:54:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:54:56 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211261648010.1505-100000@shagrat.silicongoblin.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Steve Linberg" <steve@silicongoblin.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:2674] Re: Ruling: ADA doesn't apply to Web X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Status: O Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 38 On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Jeff Carter wrote: > Returning, briefly, to the issue of media accessibility: those of you > who use or have followed the development of the Bobby Web site > accessibility tool may find this press release of interest. As some of > you know, CAST sold Bobby to a company called Watchfire, which has now > incorporated accessibility checks into it's Web QA software. > > I believe Watchfire intends to continue making the stand-alone Bobby > tool available at no charge. Sort of. It seems they're changing their policies rapidly. Last week I found that they had instituted a daily limit that was extremely small - one or two pages per day, not useful for checking sites. As of today they seem to have changed to a one-page-per-minute policy, which is much more reasonable, and say you can purchase a personal version for $99. Still, you aren't going to rapid-fire through your site like this, so be prepared to spend some time with it if you're going to use it. (Or to buy it, if you have a budget for it.) Since I haven't been able to find any alternate tools that do this, I hope they do choose to keep their access policies reasonable; very few people check their sites for Bobby-compliance to begin with, and very very very few people will be willing to pay to do so. I'm keenly aware of the costs involved in providing free services, especially popular ones, so I'm glad they're not pulling the plug altogether, but this seems like the kind of product it would be nice to have corporate/government sponsorship for rather than hitting up the users trying to make their sites accessible. - Steve -- Steve Linberg, Chief Goblin Silicon Goblin Technologies http://silicongoblin.com Be kind. Remember, everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:44:49 EST