Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id gB6ImiX07462; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:48:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:48:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <25EE8C5C-094A-11D7-96CD-0030656A26C8@worlded.org> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Jeff Carter <jcarter@worlded.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:2686] Re: Article: Internet Censorship in China X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Status: O Content-Length: 505 Lines: 22 One of the interesting things about the Chinese site-blocking is how idiosyncratic it is. According to the Harvard report, one site that is blocked is Canada's National Adult Literacy Database (NALD). Why would this site be on their list? <http://www.nald.ca> I didn't notice any U.S.-based literacy sites mentioned as being blocked. Jeff Jeff Carter World Education Boston, MA (617) 482-9485 -------------- e-mail: jcarter@worlded.org <http://literacytech.worlded.org> <http://www.worlded.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:44:50 EST