Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i97H0x823307; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20041007125847.00a95048@mail.psnyc.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Mariann Fedele <mariannf@lacnyc.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3315] Re: Integrating technology X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Status: O Content-Length: 3757 Lines: 110 Thanks Jackie this is a very useful summary of the AALPD discussion. For Tech list subscribers, are you using any of the below products and/or approaches with you learners? If so, can you share some of your succeses with the list. Regards, Mariann At 09:01 PM 10/06/2004 -0400, you wrote: >Hello everyone, >I hope it’s not too late to contribute to the question Mariann posed here. >Mariann mentioned that we have been discussing Liz Dillon-Marable’s >dissertation on computer technology integration (CTI) on the NIFL-AALPD list, >and how CTI might relate to staff development. I’ve written a very brief >summary of what we shared thus far (see below), in case NIFL-Technology >subscribers may wish to explore the topic here. I look forward to learning of >your experiences with CTI. > >Best, > >Jackie > >Jackie Taylor >Moderator, NIFL-AALPD >jataylor@utk.edu >======================================== >“What does computer technology integration ‘look like’ for you?” We began >discussing CTI in terms of delivering basic skills instruction, and several >subscribers shared reviews of software based on their experiences using it in >their programs. I started to cut/paste the links and reviews into this email, >but it quickly became an unwieldy message for a discussion list! Some >examples/points from the discussion include: > >- "For the nonreader to around middle 4th grade (TABE referenced) we use >Language Tune-up Kit (LTK)…It's Orton-Gillingham based. The beauty of this is >the simplicity of usage for the student. Symbology is used for navigation >while visual cues are accompanied by auditory instructions. It's strength >lies in the auditory, visual, and haptic combination of student involvement." > >- Product comparison of Lexia SOS & LTK; Review of Ultimate Phonics and >several other product/program descriptions > >- Massachusetts has supported pilot programs integrating various kinds of >technology with ABE instruction through the 'Anytime Anywhere' initiative. >Teachers share what works in a “Best Practices” forum. See pilot reports at >www.SABES.org > >- The state of Kentucky uses PLATO in adult education: >http://www.kyvae.org/Courses/Courses.asp?PID=150 > >- For instructional websites, see links section of http://www.lvgh.org/ > > >Then we discussed how we understand/use technology in “more differentiated” >ways: > >- "What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy.” Book by >author James Gee. > >- Using email to develop reading/writing skills > >- Using the discussion board in Blackboard for collaboration and problem >solving > >- Using simulations and role plays in workplace literacy combining reading, >writing, and in some cases, actual costuming > >- Classroom virtual visits > >- Project-based or “constructivist” learning, integrating computer technology >via Powerpoint, web pages, photo essays, science projects, etc. > >- The role of technology in knowledge transmission versus knowledge >construction > >- The compatibility of computer technology with differing teaching >philosophies– can compatibility be “taught”? > >- The role of computer technology in collaborative learning and group dynamics > >- Supporting teachers in imbedding technology in instructional approaches > >- Lynda Ginsburg’s four models of technology integration and how that is used >in a Brooklyn program > >To view the archives, visit: http://www.nifl.gov/nifl-aalpd/2004/ >================================================ > > > Mariann Fedele Coordinator of Professional Development, Literacy Assistance Center Interim Moderator, NIFL Technology and Literacy Discussion List 32 Broadway 10th Floor New York, New York 10004 212-803-3325 mariannf@lacnyc.org www.lacnyc.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:48:06 EST