[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3432] RE: Computer Technology Integration - Discussion Question 1

From: Barbara Sabaj (bjteach@ameritech.net)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2005 - 23:31:57 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j1F4VvC13758; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:31:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:31:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200502150429.j1F4TOC13605@literacy.nifl.gov>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Barbara Sabaj" <bjteach@ameritech.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3432] RE: Computer Technology Integration - Discussion Question 1
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 5713
Lines: 177

In the literacy/CAI program that I run, learners use both computers and
traditional methods of learning.  In the groups, learners and volunteer
tutors and/or instructor work on a "Write Around".  After they write down
their answers, learners discuss what they wrote.  Once discussed, learners
move to the computers to use the word processor to write down the
information generated in the "Write Around." The learners print out the work
and another discussion involves how to make the work better.  This may lead
to a learner working on a grammar program to help solve a recurring problem
in their writing or a vocabulary program to aid them in creating a
well-written work.

Barbara Sabaj
bjteach@ameritech.net
bsabaj@d214.org
bsabaj@thecenterweb.org
847-392-9894 

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-technology@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-technology@nifl.gov] On Behalf
Of Liz Dillon-Marable
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 9:27 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3417] Computer Technology Integration - Discussion
Question 1

Hello everyone,
My name is Liz Dillon-Marable, and I recently
completed a study under the supervision of Tom
Valentine at the University of Georgia in which I
tried to understand what computer technology
integration is and what determines whether or not
instructors will use it.  

Although studies indicate that computers are
beneficial, it is extremely difficult to put such
research findings to work because of the considerable
variability in what happens day-by-day and
hour-by-hour in any given ABSE classroom. Clearly,
there are activities for which computers are valuable
additions to traditional instructional methods.
However, there are other activities in which computers
do not add to  and may even detract from 
instructional effectiveness. So how does a teacher
manage computer technology in a way that optimizes its
instructional value? 
 
This study is not about software  it is about
something broader  Ultimately, we came to the
conclusion that computer technology integration simply
cannot be considered as a function of time, nor is it
reflected in the sheer quantity of technology. Rather,
there is a deeper, more complex logic that must be at
work that explains effective computer use. When we
forced ourselves to articulate what effective computer
use was, we concluded that computer technology
integration was evidenced in a thoughtful blend of
instructional modalities and thoughtful planning
around student objectives and program outcomes

In terms of what computer technology integration is -
heres what we found. A classroom with optimal CTI has
4 major characteristics: It is Seamless,
Learner-Appropriate, Learner Empowering, and
Instructor-Facilitated. 

I would like to conduct the first part of this
discussion around those four areas and explore
practices that you believe are indicators of these
characteristics. Specifically, Id like you to
describe learning activities that you practice in your
classroom  or that you have seen in someone elses
classroom  that capture the these four attributes of
optimal computer technology integration. We can begin
with the attribute of seamlessness. 
	

Can you describe a classroom in which you observed
learners moving easily between computer-based
instruction and other forms of instruction. What did
you observe? How did you determine that what you
observed was indeed the seamless use of computer
technology?
	
Seamless - There is easy movement between
computer-based instruction and other forms of
instruction. 
Thanks,
Liz


Elizabeth Dillon Marable, Ph.D.
Independent Consultant 
Phone: 706-769-5413
Fax: 706-769-0362

--- Mariann Fedele <mariannf@lacnyc.org> wrote:

> Good day all,
> 
> I'm happy to welcome Liz Dillon-Marable to the Tech
> list as our guest
> moderator. All of this week and through the
> beginning of next week Liz will
> be sharing information about her research on
> computer technology
> integration in the adult literacy classroom, about
> her dissertation titled
> "Conceptualization, Measurement and Prediction of
> Computer Technology in
> Adult Basic Skills Education," and asking question
> for you to respond and
> guiding discussion.
> 
> For purposes of this discussion here are some
> working definitions:
> 
> Computer technology integration: (a) allows for
> seamless movement between
> technology-based and non-technology-based
> instructional formats, (b) is
> appropriate for learners, (c) is facilitated by
> instructors,
> and (d) is learner empowering.
> 
> *Seamless - There is easy movement between
> computer-based instruction and
> other forms of instruction.
> 
> *Learner-Appropriate - Learners are able to use the
> computer technology in
> the classroom.
> 
> *Learner-Empowering - Learners are proactive in
> using computer technology
> for learning.
> 
> *Instructor-Facilitated - Instructors facilitate
> learners' effective use
> of computer technology in the classroom
> 
> Liz's dissertation can be downloaded at:
>
http://graduate.gradsch.uga.edu/etdarchive/spring2004/dillon-marable_elizabe
> th_200405_phd.pdf
> 
> 
> I hope that as many list members as possible will
> participate in this
> discussion and take advantage of Liz's active
> presence on our list.
> 
> Best regards,
> Mariann
> 
> 
> 
> Mariann Fedele
> Coordinator of Professional Development, 
> Literacy Assistance Center
> Moderator,
> NIFL Technology and Literacy Discussion List
> 32 Broadway 10th Floor
> New York, New York 10004
> 212-803-3325
> mariannf@lacnyc.org
> www.lacnyc.org
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:50:07 EST