Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j22GbFC18076; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:37:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:37:15 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <143400-22005332163518871@M2W066.mail2web.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "bonniesophia@adelphia.net" <bonniesophia@adelphia.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3536] RE: Reading online vs reading print X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 980 Lines: 30 I made a statement to that effect in a post I believe to this list, but I didn't have a study, just an intuition that reading patterns would be less linear, and more in "blocks" or "quadrants:" Skim and scan would be the operative technique here, I bleieve, but I, too, would appreciate any studies. Bonnie Odiorne, Ph.D. Writing Center, English Language Institute Post University, Waterbury, CT Original Message: ----------------- From: Marian Thacher mthacher@otan.us Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:01:07 -0500 (EST) To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3534] Reading online vs reading print I recently read something about a study of the skills needed for reading online, somewhat different than those required for reading print. Does anyone remember this, or can you direct me to any such study? Thanks, Marian -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:50:10 EST