[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3688] Re: Distance Learning

From: David Rosen (djrosen@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Jul 20 2005 - 16:44:29 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j6KKiTG27825; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:44:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:44:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <39EF69D4-675D-4524-9D88-394711171A8F@comcast.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: David Rosen <djrosen@comcast.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3688] Re: Distance Learning
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 3043
Lines: 93

Hell Renata,

On Jul 20, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Renata Russo wrote:

> Roughly, what is the percentage of video and other paper materials   
> that are part of Distance Learning programs as opposed to online  
> instruction? Are programs using both? If so, what has proven to be  
> more successful?

I think this varies from DL program to program.  In the DL Research  
project I was part of in Massachusetts in 2003-2004, we were  
surprised by how much students said they used print materials in  
their DL learning.  One might think that in pure DL all the  
instruction now is on computer or video (tape, CD-ROM, DVD etc.) I  
don't think that's necessarily the case. Paper materials are still an  
important component.

Jere, does Project IDEAL have any research data on use of paper  
materials vs. video vs other kinds of instruction from its other sites?

Jere -- and others : Does anyone know if  the Adult Literacy Media  
Alliance has data on this from TV411 users? Or Intellicom from  
Crossoads Cafe users? Do California researchers or developers have  
this information for English For All?  Do any of the other DL product  
creators have this kind of information about how their products are  
used? Are data on this question available from Canada, Australia,  
Ireland, or other countries which are using DL.

David J. Rosen
djrosen@comcast.net




> Renata Russo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nifl-technology@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-technology@nifl.gov]On
> Behalf Of Ujwala Samant
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:22 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3683] Re: Distance Learning
>
>
> Dear David,
>
> Firstly I think that we need to clarify  distance
> learning for whom, by whom and for what purpose. In my
> experience of distance learning (having worked for
> ALMA and done an evaluation of Crossroads Cafe amongst
> other things), these three issues are crucial to any
> discussion about distance learning.
>
> In the case of Crossroads Cafe, all the learners I
> interviewed said very clearly that whilst it was  a
> nice enough show, they needed language practice to
> really speak English, which is what they all wanted to
> do and I spoke with people who had Ph.Ds and no
> education at all.
>
> As you mentioned:
>
>
>> 1. Pure Distance Learning<
>>
>
> People who do this are indpendent learners, and often
> already have some education.
>
>
>>
>> 2. Hybrid or blended learning<<
>>
>
> In the case of TV 411 and Crossroads Cafe, this
> approach seemed to be used the most and was better
> liked than approach 1.
>
> In India, from what I've researched, learning groups
> in front of a telly (especially in the case of women)
> is not uncommon at all. In all three slums I studied,
> women said they preferred learning in groups, whilst
> using the television as the 'medium' or instruction.
>
> Regards,
> Ujwala
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:50:14 EST