[NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3796] Technology versus print Reading results

From: Tina_Luffman@yc.edu
Date: Fri Oct 07 2005 - 12:20:19 EDT 

Return-Path: <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j97GKIG15573; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <OF88AFE74A.1AB0FB18-ON07257093.00597E60-07257093.00597E64@yc.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Tina_Luffman@yc.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-technology@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-TECHNOLOGY:3796] Technology versus print Reading results
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Status: O
Content-Length: 990
Lines: 13
Hi NIFL listserv,
 
Please forgive me for continuing this conversation briefly, but here at Yavapai College we have seen a marked increase in Reading educational gains after implementing Reading Power Modules, a reading software program, into our GED curriculum. Most students come up 2-3 grade levels within a month, and they are so much more engaged in the subject, over having them work out of the GED workbooks.
 
This evidence is merely pragmatic success at our program, not documented research, but I thought it might be worth sharing with everyone.
Thanks,
 
Tina Luffman



Tina Luffman
Instructional Specialist, ABE-GED
Verde Valley Campus
634-6544
tina_luffman@yc.edu

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:50:17 EST