Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id QAA10782; Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:48:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:48:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <s88f0807.063@nmail.epcc.edu> Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Andres Muro" <AndresM@epcc.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:458] Re: New International Report on Abuse X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.3 Status: OR Daphnee: It depends on the context. It must be available to participatns in all contexts. IE: If there is a stand alone lit. program, domestic violence should be explored. If the lit. program has a health ed. component, domestic violence could be articulated into health. If the lit program is part of a larger institution, all participants in the institution should have access to domestic violence presentations. However, the presentation may be adapted to the context of the class. Andres >>> ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu 01/26 11:54 am >>> A question: Do people have any thoughts about the pro and cons of including domestic violence as part of a general health literacy program, vs. treating it as part of a general adult literacy program, vs. treating it as a distinct curriculum? Daphne Daphne Greenberg Center for the Study of Adult Literacy Georgia State University University Plaza Atlanta, GA 30303-3083 Fax: 404-651-1415 Ph: 404-651-0400 E-mail: alcdgg@langate.gsu.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:46:32 EST