[NIFL-WOMENLIT:991] Re: Women and guilt

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Sun Sep 24 2000 - 21:53:28 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e8P1rS924395; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:53:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:53:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4a.b45faab.2700092b@aol.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:991] Re: Women and guilt
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 621
Lines: 14

This is a short note.

I have been puzzled about how to think about violence that is culturally 
sanctioned.  What to say?  My conclusion:  violence is a technique for 
getting and enforcing power.  I think if I were teaching now I would 
somewhere insert that phrase in the teaching dialogue.  It is unassailable 
and general enough to open up much discussion, I should think.

Now, I think women working collectively is a good idea, whether politically, 
socially, or economically.  There really is power in numbers.  A literacy 
class would be an ideal place for this to happen, a model for what is 
possible.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:46:44 EST