[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1184] Re: "those now described as white"

From: Felicia S. (saucy073@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 11:24:06 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f0VGO6902943; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:24:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:24:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <F1260qPzg9uV54Ogddu00000c56@hotmail.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Felicia S." <saucy073@hotmail.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1184] Re: "those now described as white"
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 3571
Lines: 88

DAPHNE
IS IT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO REOMOVE ME FROM THE LIST?  I WOULD APPRECIATE IF 
YOU WOULD?

THANK YOU
FS


>From: "Daphne Greenberg" <ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu>
>Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov
>To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
>Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1178] Re: "those now described as white"
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:26:34 -0500 (EST)
>
>I have traveled quite a bit in Latin America, and it may be true that in 
>many Latin American countries they "don't pay attention to race in the same 
>ways that we do in the USA", however there still exist very strong racially 
>based discriminatory practices.  For example, in my most recent trip, I 
>went to Brazil.  I was immediately struck by the much more frequent  Black 
>and White couples, friends, groups, and people just hanging out together.  
>From my outsider's perspective, Brazilian society definitely appeared to be 
>more advanced than we are in terms of interracial socialization.  However, 
>I then realized that although this was true in the realm of socialization, 
>it was not true in the work world, where things appeared to be very 
>stratified along color lines.
>So, I think that racial discrimination is a fact everywhere, although some 
>countries are more progressive, some less, and the expressions of it may 
>differ from culture to culture.
>Daphne
>
>
>Daphne Greenberg
>Center for the Study of Adult Literacy
>Georgia State University
>University Plaza
>Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
>Fax: 404-651-1415
>Ph: 404-651-0400
>E-mail: alcdgg@langate.gsu.edu
>
> >>> sylrain@teleport.com 01/30 1:47 PM >>>
>At 10:47 AM 1/30/01 -0500, you wrote:
><SNIP>
> >And I don't think we'll be getting rid of the word "race" anytime soon.
> >What would be our reasons for doing so?
> >
><SNIP>
>
>
>Well, I don't know about the word, but the concept could use some work.
>"Race" is totally a construct that makes no logical sense, when you get 
>down
>to cases. That is, it makes no biological sense. We use it loosely as a
>synonym for "ethnicity," which makes slightly more sense, but still is
>problematic. We overlay lots of cultural, economic, social, place of 
>origin,
>religious, and other considerations on it.
>
>I remember a story told by a woman years ago who came from Jamaica to the
>U.S. Her skin is just about as black as can be. She checked "black" on the
>form where it asked about race, and the official objected. No, he said,
>you're not black, you're Jamaican. She looked at her arm, and back at him,
>and got really puzzled.
>
>I've always remembered that story. The official was evidently thinking of
>African American, not black, so it clearly had nothing to do with any
>biological reality. This woman said that in central and south America they
>just don't pay attention to race in the same ways that we do in the USA.
>It's understood that we're all mixtures and the different mixtures don't
>necessarily confer some special privilege.
>
>That's the crux of the race problem, after all. It's that some "races" are
>marked for special privilege and others are marked for deprivation. It's 
>the
>same problem with language. The difference between a "dialect" and a
>"language" is that speakers of a language have a navy.
>
>It's all about economic and social and political privilege.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Sylvan Rainwater . Portland, Oregon, USA . sylrain@teleport.com
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:08 EST