[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1216] LD and women

From: Daphne Greenberg (ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 09:17:55 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f16EHe920279; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:17:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:17:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <sa7fc0a1.040@langate.gsu.edu>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Daphne Greenberg" <ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1216] LD and women
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.3.1
Status: O
Content-Length: 4083
Lines: 88

Glenn,
Thanks for raising this issue.  Have any changes occurred since your study concerning the under identification of females who are LD?
Daphne

Daphne Greenberg
Center for the Study of Adult Literacy
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
Fax: 404-651-1415
Ph: 404-651-0400
E-mail: alcdgg@langate.gsu.edu

>>> Glenn_Young@ed.gov 02/05 12:27 PM >>>

what is also left out - is that females, although just as likely to have
Learning Disabilities, as males, are greatly underidentified, and therefore
less likely to gain civil rights protections for the use of accommodations
in the GED... this also raises may issues of diganostic testing being biased
against women ... etc..

But this needs to be raised in addressing issues of GED ...

Glenn Young
OVAE
-----Original Message-----
From: Daphne Greenberg [mailto:ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu] 
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1205] GED and Women


Last week I posted a cross post from NLA about an article on GED and women.
I got around to reading it and here are some points from the article that I
found interesting, especially in light of Andrea's postings about the
importance of money (If you are not interested in reading all these points,
scroll down to point number 7 which depicts a pretty sad case for the lack
of economic independence for women who earn the GED):
1. The typical woman in the sample dropped out of school after completing
the 9th grade sample, and had a mother who completed only slightly more
education than herself.
2.In the article, the percentages of the sample obtaining a GED is charted
by age, and it is clear that the younger students (17) obtain the GED at
higher percentages than students in their late 20's.
3.  A table shows that a large fraction of the relatively small number of
women who complete a year or more of college do so in their late twenties.
4. In this sample, women who participate in further education have higher
test scores and more educated parents than other female dropouts.
5. The authors conducted various statistical analyses and found that:
a. By the 7th year after obtaining her GED, women receive an earnings boost
of $1,328.  This earnings gain represents a 25% increase over what the woman
is predicted to have earned had she not obtained the credential.
b. During the years in which a woman who has attained a GED participates in
off the job training, she earns $2,143 less than she would have otherwise
earned.  During the years in which she is in college, she foregoes about
$773.  
c. For each year of off the job training, a woman earns $1,239 more in all
future years and for each year of college she completes, the impact on her
earnings is a gain of $1,153.
d. In this sample, a married woman is predicted to earn $410 per year less
than she would if she were unmarried; a mother is predicted to earn $2,690
per year less than she would earn if she were childless.
6. Ten years after dropping out of high school, a woman who obtained a GED
the 3rd year after she dropped out is not significantly more likely to be
employed than she would have been without the GED.
7. A woman who obtains a year off the job training 3 years after dropping
out of high school is 13% more likely to be working in the 10th year after
she dropped out than she otherwise would have been.
7. A woman who both obtains a GED and completes a year of training or
college is still predicted to earn LESS THAN $8,000 in the 10th year after
dropping out of school.
Do these points stir up any issues/questions/concerns for you that you would
like to share on the listserv?
For those of you who have not had a chance to read the article and would
like to: the article can be found in the journal called the Monthly Labor
Review. It can also be found on-line at
http://stats.bls.gov/opub/mlr/mlrhome.htm 
Daphne

Daphne Greenberg
Center for the Study of Adult Literacy
Georgia State University
University Plaza
Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
Fax: 404-651-1415
Ph: 404-651-0400
E-mail: alcdgg@langate.gsu.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:09 EST