[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1482] Re: agendas

• Next message: ujwala samant: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1483] Re: agendas"
• Previous message: Daphne Greenberg: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1481] Re: agendas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f57DvIf26689; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:57:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <43.16520bc5.2850e200@aol.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1482] Re: agendas
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 187
Lines: 5

You'd have to define "liberatory."  Of course, I say off the bat, thinking I 
know what the word means.  Can anyone demonstrate that literacy ISN'T 
liberatory?  Step right up...

Andrea

• Next message: ujwala samant: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1483] Re: agendas"
• Previous message: Daphne Greenberg: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1481] Re: agendas"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:15 EST