[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1538] Re: Ethical question

From: AndresMuro@aol.com
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 17:04:43 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f6UL4hf03252; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <35.1888dbb9.289724d0@aol.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AndresMuro@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1538] Re: Ethical question
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Status: O
Content-Length: 304
Lines: 14

See my answer to Daphnee

Andres

In a message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:44:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time, AWilder106@aol.com writes:

> Well, pal, it depends on the moral questions, seems to me.  White 
> supremacists?  NONONO.  
> 
> This is not a very enlightening response, I understand.
> 
> Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:17 EST