[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1693] Re: Silence

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 05 2001 - 09:56:37 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f95Dub025092; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <6a.146f316c.28ef1558@aol.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1693] Re: Silence
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 458
Lines: 9

"Freedom" is part of our national mantra.  I think it unites many groups, the 
word itself whereas other words divide.  Try saying "socialized medicine" in 
a crowd and see what happens.  A senator from N. Carolina and a guy from NH 
who may be on opposite sides of almost every issue will smile and be friends 
when using the word "freedom."  It transcends sectionalism.

This is a good question, I will now notice the contexts it which it is used.

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:20 EST