Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f95G5x029576; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 12:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <46.1bafc336.28ef339a@aol.com> Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1700] Re: Survival vs. Functional Literacy X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Status: O Content-Length: 260 Lines: 8 Daphne, Functional literature is learning the rules of the game, that's how I think of it, and no matter what you think of the rules of the game, you need to survive. Afterwards, maybe things can open up a bit. This is a very realpolitic answer. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:32:21 EST