[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1907] Re: State of the Union Address

From: Barbara Cleveland (eldersense@prexar.com)
Date: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 11:23:44 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0VGNin21778; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:23:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:23:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <00b201c1aa71$b0ee05e0$4620a78e@7wpan>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Barbara Cleveland" <eldersense@prexar.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1907] Re: State of the Union Address
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 1629
Lines: 38

thank you for your comments, ujwala...I have been cringing at the word
"evil" ever since I read it in the NY Times last night. I have to say, I
can't listen to him in person so I try to read what he has to say in the
newspapers and listen to alternative presses and radio. what are we to do. I
find the USA very frightening now and I live here. Be Well Barbara
----- Original Message -----
From: "ujwala samant" <usamant@home.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1906] Re: State of the Union Address


> The persistent use of the word "evil" gave me the shivers. To me that
reeked
> of fanaticism. And whilst he mentioned not forcing American culture on
other
> countries, that is precisely what we see happening everywhere, whether at
> the GATT, WTO, IMF, the World Bank, or that Lt. McSally's imposition of
> wearing western clothes in Saudi Arabia. He means to spread American
> hegemony of the worst kind possible, everywhere. If this was to deal with
> domestic agenda, it was piggy backed on a discussion of the war and those
> evil countries. There was no serious discussion (even interrupted by that
> cheerleading yahooism at every sentence) on education, human rights
abuses,
> slowing down the corporations ....... I am most disheartened, but then at
> least aside from his mention of Korea, Iraq and Iran, there were no
> surprises. Women's rights of course have been relegated to the wings.
>
> I am sure my opinions will displease some, and I apologise if I have
> offended anybody.
>
> regards
> Ujwala
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:45:37 EST