[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1998] Re: caste

• Next message: blue birds: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1999] Re: caste"
• Previous message: Ujwala Samant: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1997] Re: caste"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g182Ldu13544; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:21:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:21:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <17a.343c794.29949015@aol.com>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:1998] Re: caste
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 168
Lines: 6

Ujwala,

Could you give an example of how caste and class are treated differently?  Or 
acknowledged to be different categories?  This is all very interesting.

Andrea

• Next message: blue birds: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1999] Re: caste"
• Previous message: Ujwala Samant: "[NIFL-WOMENLIT:1997] Re: caste"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:45:39 EST