Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h4GBtmC01877; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <C053D08C-8794-11D7-9403-000393ABE4D2@litwomen.org> Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "mev@litwomen.org" <mev@litwomen.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2586] censorship at nifl? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Status: RO Content-Length: 456 Lines: 12 Janet, Thanks for alerting us to the purging that is going on. On another listserv, I read that not only is purging going on, but something equally scary. All messages sent to NIFL discussion lists are not being posted IF they contain certain terms and phrases. Unfortunately, I cannot mention these terms and phrases, because if I do, this message will not be posted! What do people think about this? What should we as a field do about this? Mev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:47 EST