[NIFL-WOMENLIT:2533] Happy International Women's Day!

From: Ujwala Samant (usamant@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 02:48:46 EST


Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h274mwP15776 for <nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov>; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:48:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ujwala (pcp02674897pcs.ewndsr01.nj.comcast.net [68.85.37.149]) by mtaout06.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with SMTP id <0HBD002KE41IJH@mtaout06.icomcast.net> for nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 23:48:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 23:48:46 -0800
From: Ujwala Samant <usamant@comcast.net>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2533] Happy International Women's Day!
To: nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov
Message-id: <01e301c2e47d$fc5ea060$95255544@ewndsr01.nj.comcast.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Status: O
Content-Length: 14761
Lines: 331


----- Original Message -----
From: Beth Myers <bmyers@womensedge.org>
To: <bmyers@womensedge.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:42 AM
Subject: Happy International Women's Day!


Dear Women’s EDGE Advocates,

Happy International Women’s Day, Saturday, March 8th!

Below are two new publications by Women’s Edge that may be of interest
and helpful to you as you educate others in your community.

If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call.

Sincerely,
Beth Myers

Publications

1. U.S. Foreign Policy Flouts Gender Equity Laws by Ritu Sharma,
Co-Founder and Executive Director of Women's Edge

2. Fact sheet: The Women of Iraq: Conflicts and Peace Building


********************
Article
********************
March 6, 2003

U.S. Foreign Policy Flouts Gender Equity Laws
Run Date: 03/05/03
By Ritu Sharma
WEnews commentator

(WOMENSENEWS)--Getting more women into foreign policy is crucial to
global human security, especially now with current U.S. foreign policy
being driven by leaders bent on pursuing war. Women can increase the
safety of all if our values and holistic sense of approaching issues are
brought to the table.
In the critical areas of foreign policy that affect the lives of women
and their communities --war, trafficking in small arms, global trade,
and international corporate investment--women, as well as their values,
needs, and creative solutions are totally absent.

To examine women in foreign policy, we must first look at the important
posts of ambassadors. Women ambassadors are to foreign policy what women
chief executive officers are to corporate America--it is the ultimate
job, the yardstick for measuring women's progress and the means to the
end of changing these fields into something more women- or even
people-friendly.
In 1949, President Harry Truman appointed the first female U.S.
ambassador, Eugenie Anderson, to Denmark as our pioneer. But she was not
able to blaze a trail that would be followed by more top female
internationalists. In the last 54 years, the United States has had 184
women ambassadors. Currently we have 30 women representing our country
out of about 167 ambassadors (18 percent)--better than our
representation in the U.S. Senate, but hardly enough to brag about.

The biggest prize of all is, of course, the post of Secretary of State.
Our "Amelia Earhart" pioneer is the former Secretary of State, Madeleine
Albright, the first woman to ever hold that position.

Former Secretary Albright's mark on foreign policy went beyond her being
simply our nation's first leading diplomat to wear pantyhose (and
brooches). She brought a somewhat different perspective to foreign
policy that was influenced by her experience as a female and during her
tenure she championed women's issues like no other Secretary of State.

Some Women in Foreign Policy Ignore Women's Needs

Clearly, not all women bring women's values and sense of what needs to
be done to make this world a secure and prosperous place. Women
comprised the majority of President Clinton's international trade
negotiating team; however, these women had to "think like a man" when it
came to making international trade policy. Bringing a set of values
grounded in women's priorities for fairness and equality or stopping to
examine how U.S. economic policies were affecting women was simply not
seen as part of the job.

The irony of a woman making foreign policy like a man could not be more
poignant than it is right now with Condoleezza Rice's role as National
Security Advisor. She is one of President Bush's strongest advocates for
the war with Iraq and has been from the beginning. Her worldview is
derived from years of study of chess-like Cold War foreign policy--one
significant reason she made it to the top. She has shown no interest in
women's issues around the world.

Rice and others like her are missing a whole sphere of women's issues in
foreign policy. War now impacts an ever greater share of women and
children civilians as they are increasingly targeted as pawns in combat.
International economic issues such as trade are affecting more and more
whether women can get jobs, hold jobs or be paid a decent wage.

Yes, generous U.S. assistance over the years has saved the lives of
millions of women, provided critically needed basic healthcare and
family planning and helped thousands of girls go to school. We know that
these kinds of investments in women yield big gains: When women earn a
little money they are far more likely than men to reinvest it in their
children's health care, education and nutrition--ending poverty one
family at a time and eventually leading to the overall economic growth
of a country.

Unfortunately, these beneficial programs are few and far between;
overall, U.S. international assistance programs and policies ignore
women's contributions and needs.

In 1993, the Government Accounting Office conducted an independent
evaluation of the U.S. Agency for International Development's progress
in meeting the requirements of the 1973 Percy Amendment that requires
U.S. aid programs to include women. The report stated that the foreign
aid agency "has only recently begun to consider the role of women in its
third-world development strategies, despite the fact that 20 years have
passed since Congress directed that AID assistance programs focus on
integrating
women . . ." Ten years later, there is still little progress.

Women and Their Values Must Be at the Table

The positive evolution of U.S. foreign policy will come through the
increased leadership of women, leadership that claims and expressly
brings women's values to the table. We have suffered a temporary
setback, but it will come in time.
To speed up the process, the Women's Edge coalition brought together
more than 60 organizations with a bi-partisan group of lawmakers to
develop a women's blueprint for U.S. foreign policy. This blueprint has
now been introduced into the U.S. Congress as the GAINS for Women and
Girls Act (Global Action and Investments for New Success for Women and
Girls).

The GAINS Act is a straightforward instruction manual for how to
integrate women's needs, priorities, and values into 11 different areas
of foreign policy from human rights, conflict resolution, and
international trade to basic education for girls and access to
comprehensive reproductive health care. Already, two pieces of the GAINS
Act have become law.

We stand at a crossroads of values in foreign policy. The values
currently dominating U.S. foreign policy (security through control,
power, and lone-ranger "justice") do not represent the majority of
women. The realization of real human security--being safe in your home
and on the street, being able to send your kids to school, having a warm
bed and a full stomach, pursuing your potential regardless of your sex,
religion or ethnicity--this is the kind of foreign policy we need.

Ritu Sharma is the co-founder and executive director of Women's Edge.

***********************
Fact Sheet: The Women of Iraq
***********************

2. The Women of Iraq: Conflicts and Peace Building

Iraqi Women
Relatively speaking, Iraqi women have many rights not seen in
neighboring Arab countries, including equal pay and the opportunity to
work in many professions.  According to Nicholas D. Kristof, a New York
Times reporter, the Iraqi women can legally drive, uncover their heads,
and serve in the army.

The Iraqi Women's Federation boasts a million and half women members,
spread out through the several provinces of Iraq. A working Iraqi mother
gets one year of maternity leave. In terms of inheritance, women as well
as men get what the law says, even the land. And there is an 85 percent
literacy rate among Iraqi women.

Indeed, a recent report prepared by Arab experts and compiled under
United Nations support concluded that although Iraq remains among the
region's least developed countries, it scored highest in women's
empowerment.
However, that being said, today Iraq is still a country where women
suffer from honor killings, and other human rights violations, not to
mention the gender-blind, vicious political repression where torture and
execution are a fact of every day life.

History
Women began taking positions in the mainstream job market as early as
the 1920s and 1930s.  In 1970, the Iraqi constitution was changed to
guarantee that all women and men are equal before the law. The 1970s and
early 1980s were years of general economic growth in Iraq and
state-induced policies worked to eradicate illiteracy, educate women and
incorporate them into the labor force. Labor was scarce, and while the
Gulf countries started to look for labor outside their national
boundaries, the Iraqi government tapped into its own human resources.
Subsequently, working outside the home did not only become acceptable
for women but prestigious and the norm.
Iraqi women became among the most educated and professional in the whole
region. However, as in many other places, conservative views did not
automatically change because women started working. And there existed
great differences between rural and urban women as well as women from
different social class backgrounds.

Economic Embargos

Living conditions for Iraqi women deteriorated after the 1991 Gulf War
and economic embargos were applied. Prior to 1991, Iraqi women were able
to find and retain jobs, obtain higher-learning, easily marry and
receive medical coverage from the most extensive and free health-care
system in the region. The choked economy has caused many women to lose
their jobs and abandon their education, thereby losing both their
financial independence as well as their best opportunities for
self-determination and liberation. Today, most women in Iraq focus all
their efforts in search of enough food and clean water to ensure their
family's survival.

In addition, the Iraqi women's movement has severely suffered due to
sanctions and anti-women legislation imposed by Hussein's regime since
the mid-90s.   Consequently, this enabled the regime to further pass
increasingly anti-women policies without any resistance from women’s
organizations.

Statistics on Iraqi Women Due to Embargos
• There has been a sharp increase in maternal mortality because
women are not getting emergency obstetric care for complications during
pregnancy and childbirth.
• Girls and women are facing a major learning gap. There has been
a sharp decline in adult female literacy and nearly twice as many girls
as boys are out of school.
• More than 35 percent of girls drop out before the end of primary
school due to the high price of school supplies and the need to help
supplement the family’s income by going to work, likely begging

Women and War

War has displaced 35 million people worldwide; 70 percent of these
refugees and displaced persons are women and children who, according to
the United Nations, bear a “disproportionate share of the suffering”
during times of armed conflict in ethnic and religious wars.   Ethnic
cleansing in Kosovo forced at least 750,000 people to flee their homes;
an overwhelming majority of these refugees were women and children.
Once war breaks out, women have little access to basic food, medicines,
hygiene, or education and employment opportunities.

Sexual violence and persecution are often adopted as tactics of war and
terrorism; recent history has seen sexual violence and rape used
deliberately and strategically as weapons of war.   Little is done to
protect women’s safety and rights in conflict situations, or to
persecute perpetrators.

If war breaks out in Iraq, it is possible that gender-based violence and
violations of human rights will increase dramatically.

Peace Building

Violence and conflict are serious impediments to countries’
participation in the global economy. During major conflicts, it is often
women that keep local economies running, and it is women who work to
rebuild economies post-conflict.  At present, economic aid to regions in
conflict rarely takes into account women’s roles as economic leaders.

In many countries, women have already taken the initiative to reach
across the conflict divide and foster peace.  In Mali and Liberia, women
joined together to collect arms.  In Northern Ireland, Catholic and
Protestant women have organized community peace-building projects
together.  Yet, time and again, women are excluded from participating in
the rebuilding of their countries.  This has been the case in
Afghanistan where women have had a limited role in shaping major
policies.  Only two women ministers are included in Afghanistan’s ruling
cabinet.

War and the GAINS for Women and Girls Act

Women’s EDGE has developed the first ever comprehensive U.S. legislation
on global women’s issues, the Global Action and Investments for New
Success (GAINS) for Women and Girls Act. The GAINS Act includes a
section that addresses “Women, Conflicts and Peace Building”.

In addition to calling for the ratification of the Optional Protocol to
the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children
in armed conflict, the GAINS Act also emphasizes programs that:
• Support women’s efforts in conflict resolution
• Promote multi-year gender-balanced economic development programs
• Improve peacekeeping operations to include the rights and needs
of women in war
• Consult with women leaders during peace negotiations
• Provide protection and assistance to refugee women and displaced
women in war
• Provide health services, including reproductive health services,
to refugee women

For more information contact Ana Rahona, Women’s EDGE at 202.884.8399 or
arahona@womensedge.org


  1. Women’s Enews, www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/1140
  2. Middle East Policy Council,
www.mepc.org/public_asp/journal_vol6/9806_halsell.asp
  3. Women’s Enews,
www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/1088/context/archive
  4. Act Together Report,
www.acttogether.org/Womengender&sanctionsinIraq.htm
  5. UNICEF, www.unicef.org/noteworthy/iraq/situation.html
  6. Common Dreams, www.commondreams.org/views02/1017-09.htm
  7. Refugees International, www.refugeesinternational.org.
  8. United Nations High Commission for Human Rights.  “Women’s Human
Rights;” United Nations; Geneva; 2000.
  9. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, www.unhcr.org.

Beth Myers
Director of Outreach and Membership
Women's Edge
1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20009
202-884-8971
For more information on Women's EDGE or to join, go to
http://www.womensedge.org





Beth Myers
Director of Outreach and Membership
Women's Edge
1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20009
202-884-8971
For more information on Women's EDGE or to join, go to
http://www.womensedge.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:49 EST