Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id hA6HXmV19380; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:33:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:33:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <sfaa3ebb.089@langate.gsu.edu> Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Daphne Greenberg" <ALCDGG@langate.gsu.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2783] Re: challenges in addition to low X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.4 Beta Status: O Content-Length: 530 Lines: 11 Janet in her response to my query of 1. How accessible is your program to individuals who need physical accomodations (railing in bathrooms, ramps instead of stairs, etc)? Answered: "Some agencies have accessible facilities, many are trying to get there and some do not - based on general observation. ..." I wonder about this. By law, don't all programs have to be accessible? To continue along these line, by law-wouldn't all programs have to make all materials accessible in braille and/or large print if needed? Daphne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:53 EST