[NIFL-WOMENLIT:2786] Re: challenges in addition to low

From: Sylvan Rainwater (sylvan@cccchs.org)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 19:14:35 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id hA70EZV19829; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:14:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:14:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <000501c3a4c4$36c98e70$1a01a8c0@cccchs.org>
Errors-To: alcrsb@langate.gsu.edu
Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Sylvan Rainwater" <sylvan@cccchs.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2786] Re: challenges in addition to low
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 2222
Lines: 49

We are blessed and cursed with the situation with adult education -- blessed
in that we have a lot of freedom to set up classes/programs as we wish
without too much interference, but cursed because we have very little status
and tend to be overlooked. And so, the law doesn't seem to care too much
about us. Many of us are working in rented or donated spaces that are more
or less adequate -- my space is actually wonderful compared to so many that
I have seen and heard about.

Public buildings do have some level of accessibility they are required to
provide, but many buildings are old and grandfathered in unless they are
sold or extensively remodeled.

In any case, it is probably true that we are required to supply
accommodation to those with disabilities, but that doesn't mean that we
recruit or accept people into the program with disabilities that we can't
serve well. It only makes sense that we accept people who can benefit the
most from our services. And, yes, I am aware that this sounds
discriminatory, and, yes, I believe we do discriminate a lot. Actually, we
are told to do so -- we are supposed to serve a certain clientele with
certain conditions to meet certain specified goals. So, contradictory
messages? Probably. It does seem to happen quite a bit.

-------
Sylvan Rainwater  mailto:sylvan@cccchs.org
Program Managaer Family Literacy
Clackamas Co. Children's Commission /  Head Start
Oregon City, OR  USA
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of
Daphne Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:2783] Re: challenges in addition to low

Janet in her response to my query of
1. How accessible is your program to individuals who need physical 
accomodations (railing in bathrooms, ramps instead of stairs, etc)? 
Answered:
"Some agencies have accessible facilities,  many are trying to get 
there and some do not - based on general observation. ..."

I wonder about this. By law, don't all programs have to be accessible? To
continue along these line, by law-wouldn't all programs have to make all
materials accessible in braille and/or large print if needed?

Daphne



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:53 EST