Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i8LLow807787; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:50:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:50:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <0I4E00K93V9VOE@l-daemon> Errors-To: listowner@nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Suzanne Smythe <smythemu@interchange.ubc.ca> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:3020] RE: question from student X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Status: O Content-Length: 2161 Lines: 50 I guess I have another question for you-is the target population you are referring to those who practice FGM or those on whom it is practised? Most effective public education Africa is done via a mix of media that includes but is certainly not limited to printed materials-in fact these are the least effective-group discussion, TV shows that dramatize social issues, comics, drama and people's theatre are all contemporary and usually effective ways of raising and discussing contentious social issues and oppressions -I am not that "illiteracy" would be a factor unless it gets privileged as the primary means of spreading information. This view could also lead to causal arguments that link "illiteracy" to FGM, which would miss the roles of gender, culture in this practice. Perhaps there is a danger in attributing to literacy too much power to effect social change? Suzanne Smythe The Weaving Literacy Training Project 288 East 46th Avenue Vancouver, BC V5W 1Z6 -----Original Message----- From: nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-womenlit@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Daphne Greenberg Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:04 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:3019] question from student Barbara has asked me to post this for her (she is currently having computer difficulties): I am a student at the University of Oklahoma, and am researching the cultural effects of illiteracy, especially among women. Are you aware of any statistics that would indicate that literacy rates play a role in the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM)? The following quote from a press release found on the Equality Now web page, http://www.equalitynow.org/english/about/about_en.html refers to the need to educate people to the dangers of FGM. "Several ex-circumcisers expressed their view that FGM could be eliminated if governments prohibited FGM, and if non-governmental organizations (NGOs) continued sensitizing the public to the dangers of FGM and educating youth to oppose the practice." To what degree do you feel illiteracy among target populations will hinder this goal? Thank you very much for your time, Barbara S. Oliver
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:48:18 EST