Return-Path: <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j9GHFKG25757; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:15:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:15:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4e0c524f0510161014q3149a547he29d59008f370d74@mail.gmail.com> Errors-To: listowner@nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Beth Sherberger <bethsherberger@gmail.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-womenlit@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WOMENLIT:3346] Re: Gender equity X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 370 Lines: 11 Wendy, What a great study! It made me think of two questions. -How else does strict adherence to traditional gender roles create numerous interpersonal problems for both men and women? ( Example: Brian Nichols case) -Has society been effective in providing models in which male and female roles are reversed?( Example: GI Jane type of movies vs. Sleeping Beauty )
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:50:27 EST