Return-Path: <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e8Q8Ii906820; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 04:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <001f01c01b0d$8ef4b320$4371c0d0@default> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Anita VanOuwerkerk" <aharvan@pnx.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:3737] Re: Candidate Information X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 860 Lines: 24 Thank you Gail. Back in the late '70's and eartly 80's, I saw teachers in Texas support a candidate rather than issues and live to regret it. Let's develop our own platform and see who supports us. Anita VanOuwerkerk GOALS Orange, TX aharvan@pnx.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <GSpan1@aol.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 2:12 PM Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:3730] Re: Candidate Information > Pardon me, but adult literacy does best when it's treated as a nonpartisan > issue, which it in fact is and ought to be. I can't think of a better way to > kill off the field, which is facing plenty of problems already, than to > engage in partisan bickering. I have my own views about whose understanding > is better, but this surely isn't the place to post them. Gail Spangenberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:42:43 EST