[NIFL-WORKPLACE:3789] RE:

From: Stoker, Linda (LStoker@oxfamamerica.org)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:54:30 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9BIsT924599; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:54:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:54:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <C192DA1514C3D111B26300805F6FCD8EA8D4BA@EXCHANGE>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Stoker, Linda" <LStoker@oxfamamerica.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:3789] RE: 
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Status: O
Content-Length: 3705
Lines: 91

Larry:

I would add that the program evaluation should demonstrate that the
requisite transfer skills were  included in the curriculum. It is unjust, I
think, to assume that the participant will figure out how to make the
transfer by him- herself given that the workplace behavioral norms
frequently support aliteracy. 

Linda

Linda Stoker
GPD Administrative Manager
Oxfam America, 26 West Street, Boston, MA  02111 USA
tel:      01-617-728-2510
fax:     01-617-728-2595
email:  lstoker@oxfamamerica.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mikulecky, Larry J. [SMTP:mikuleck@indiana.edu]
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 11, 2000 11:16 AM
> To:	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:	[NIFL-WORKPLACE:3785] RE: Evaluation and Standardized
> testing
> 
> Heidi:
> 
> The face-to-face contact time in workplace literacy programs, indeed in
> most
> adult literacy programs, is usually less than 50 hours.  This, all by
> itself, isn't sufficient practice time to make much impact on general
> literacy standardized tests.  If a general literacy standardized test is
> the
> ONLY measure of success, there is a problem.  The evaluators aren't
> measuring enough to capture all that a program is doing.
> 
> I think part of the solution is recognizing that learner literacy practice
> must also occur and increase outside the literacy classroom (at home and
> on
> the job).  This means that one aspect of program success is the degree to
> which the learner's goals have been engaged and the degree to which habits
> have been changed to include literacy away from the classroom. A person
> with
> changed habits and goals is likely to continue with literacy growth and
> this
> is an important program goal. These things can be assessed and I think
> ought
> to be.
> 
> In addition, a good deal of research has documented that gains with the
> sorts of literacy one has been practicing with occur long before transfer
> to
> broad, general literacy occurs.  For this reason, part of program and
> learner assessment in workplace literacy programs should also include
> measures of increased comprehension and mastery with the specialized
> materials which have been integrated into the workplace literacy program.
> 
> I don't think the problem is that general standardized tests are being
> used.
> A fifty contact hour program which has also gotten students to practice a
> couple of hours outside of class for each hour inside may have impact on
> general literacy. I think the problem is that in some programs ONLY
> standardized tests are being used and other program goals (eg. improved
> ability with workplace literacy, changed goals and behaviors, improved
> literacy strategies, improved productivity, increased confidence and
> willingness to take futher training, etc.) are not also being assessed and
> taken into account.
> 
> Larry Mikulecky
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heidi Watson [mailto:haw6@psu.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 6:59 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:3782] Evaluation and Standardized testing
> 
> 
> 
> "Most workplace literacy programs do not have sufficient time with
> learners
> to make much impact on standardized tests.*snip* It is important to note
> these positive changes and to give credit to teachers and programs for
> making them."
> 
> Larry is giving the credit administrators of programs or the student?
> Whether we have enough time with students or not we are often require to
> give standardized assessments anyway. From these scores the quality of our
> programs are judged. I believe this creates a real struggle for many
> workplace education programs.
> 
> Heidi Watson
> NIFL-Workplace Co-Moderator



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:42:44 EST