[NIFL-WORKPLACE:639] Re: taking away $$$ for adult learners?

From: Kate Hallen (khallen@mail.lesley.edu)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 14:28:03 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id gBAJS2X06062; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:28:03 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:28:03 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <a05100305ba1bed4de66b@[205.173.155.165]>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Kate Hallen <khallen@mail.lesley.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:639] Re: taking away $$$ for adult learners?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Status: O
Content-Length: 1035
Lines: 31

>Why is it that the Bush administration seems so hell bent on
>taking away educational programs for adult learners --
>directly or indirectly...?
>
>--I think it is because they  want to expand the pool of service
>workers. Florida's biggest GOP donors included Wal-Mart,the
>cruise ship industry and theme park owners...these
>businesses need many low-wage workers. Without education
>for adult learners there will be a larger pool competing for
>service jobs. By cutting adult learning funds the pool of those
>stuck in low-wage jobs expands.


I agree. It's not accidental--whether conscious or not, maintenance 
of the "balance"--a small percentage with a lot of money/power on top 
and a large percentage with little on the bottom to keep it 
stable--is in the interests of many a wealthy legislator. Ick!



-- 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kate Hallen
Creative Arts in Learning
Lesley University
29 Everett St
Cambridge MA 02138
khallen@lesley.edu
617-349-8596 * fax: 617-349-8142 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:25 EST