[NIFL-WORKPLACE:715] RE: webreaper

From: Kevin O'Connor (koconnor@framingham.k12.ma.us)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 09:20:50 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h6HDKo707182; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:20:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:20:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <26583D62A957714EAD30C4979B9359829E0E82@mccmail.fpsnet.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Kevin O'Connor" <koconnor@framingham.k12.ma.us>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-workplace@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:715] RE: webreaper
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 3289
Lines: 76

John, good point-

"Speaking of a one-govt. state, many of us believe that the demo and repubs are the same party now.

Although I would actually say that they are the same class.  As Zinn says, the Democrats are just more willing to make concessions to the lower classes. "A republican fundraising dinner may be $500,000 a plate, whereas a Democratic one is only $400,000."

I may be misquoting a little, but that's the gist.  No wonder there is such a low voter turn out.

Kevin O'Connor
Framingham Adult ESL 
508-626-4282
koconnor@framingham.k12.ma.us


-----Original Message-----
From: John Kamplain [mailto:john_kamplain@albanyparkcommunitycenter.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:714] RE: webreaper


Some considerations regarding your last couple posts:

1. According to the article in eSchool News Online: Luna Levinson, director
of the ERIC program at ED's Institute of Education Sciences, said
"...Centralization of the system will make it more cost effective, Levinson
argued, eliminating the duplicative work of database-building and allowing
the department to reduce its labor costs. These savings, in turn, will
provide funding to expand ERIC's coverage, add full-text articles, and
introduce new technologies into the system.

In addition, Levinson said, the new ERIC will be able to incorporate new
research and information more quickly-instead of three to 24 months after it
becomes available, after being processed by separate contractors.

2. Independent clearing houses will be going in favor of one larger
database. This does not mean the elimination of information or even the
limiting of access to information. I, for one, like this new feature as much
of my work as a computer literacy teacher / computer lab manager crosses
over to more than one area (ie ESL, Workforce Development, Civics, GED, ABE,
Math, Science, Reading, etc.).

3. Information isn't being eliminated, it is being re-packaged. You mention
tax dollars and the new changes sound to me like a more prudent use of said
tax dollars.

4. We haven't really had a lot of time to test the new website yet. Maybe it
will work well, maybe it won't. I say let's give it a try before declaring a
big brother scenario where the one party govt. is plotting how to keep
teachers in the dark about professional development. Speaking of a one-govt.
state, many of us believe that the demo and repubs are the same party now.

5. Although the ERIC listservs will be eliminated, we still have NIFL's
website and listservs to help us out. I find much in NIFL's LINCS to be more
practical in my day to day work than much of the pedagogy I'd often find at
ERIC.

6. You can use the webreaper or not. It's up to you. It's a valuable tool,
though. However, I think the issue of "protecting access from our own govt.
is specious at best.




> -----Original Message-----
> From: nifl-workplace@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-workplace@nifl.gov]On Behalf
> Of kmccook@tampabay.rr.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:08 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [NIFL-WORKPLACE:713] webreaper
>
>
> Why in heaven's name should each person have to download
> all these sites that were paid for with tax dollars to protect
> access from our own government?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:59 EST