[Assessment 1337] Re: Tests vs. Self Assessments of Literacytsticht at znet.com tsticht at znet.comMon Jun 9 21:37:24 EDT 2008
Daphne: You asked: 1. Is it possible that some/many struggling adult readers are okay with their level of literacy performance? Perhaps they have jobs/community support that meet their literacy abilities and needs. My response: In 2002 I wrote the following note that discusses differences among whites, blacks, and Hispanics in terms of their measured (test scores) and self-perceptions of reading abilities and discussed "sub-cultural niches" which people may occupy that influence their perceived reading abilities. This seems to me to be related to your ideas in the above question. It is an interesting puzzle of diversity and literacy. Tom Sticht Research Note December 10, 2002 Where does the reading problem go when children grow up? Thomas G. Sticht International Consultant in Adult Education Have the reading skills of students coming out of the K-12 public school system declined in the last half century? The 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) provides some data bearing on this issue. The NALS assessed adult literacy using three scales: Prose, Document and Quantitative. A report on the Literacy of Older Adults in America, from the National Center for Education Statistics in Washington, DC, November 1996 (p. 35) reported data on the age and literacy proficiency for adults with varying amounts of education. For adults with 0-12 years of education but no high school diploma or GED, proficiency on the NALS Prose scale were: Age Proficiency 16-24 233 25-59 210 60-69 211 For adults with high school diplomas or GEDs the average literacy proficiencies for the three age groups were: Age Proficiency 16-24 274 25-59 273 60-69 262 For adults with post-secondary education the average literacy proficiencies for the three age groups were: Age Proficiency 16-24 311 25-59 315 60-69 293 >From these NALS data, it appears that for adults across 60 years of age their literacy skills do not vary much on the average. This would seem to indicate that regardless of how literacy has been taught in the last 60 years, once adults with similar amounts of schooling get out of school and spend some time in other activities, their literacy skills dont differ very much, at least for the adults sampled in 1992 and assessed using the functional literacy tasks of the NALS. Adult's Perceptions of Their Reading Skills It is one thing to use standardized tests to judge the reading skills of adults and still another to ask those same adults how well they read the English language. The question is, do the nation's adults think they have a reading problem? The 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) asked adults to rate their own reading skills as they perceived them. In the report on the Literacy of Older Adults in America, from the National Center for Education Statistics in Washington, DC, November 1996, the authors reported (p. 43) that adults aged 16 to 59 rated themselves as reading Very Well-72%, Well-22% and Not Well/Not At All-7%. Overall, then, some 93% of adults in this age range rated themselves as reading Well or Very Well. When broken out by ethnic groups, ratings were found of Whites: Very Well-77%, Well-21%, or Not Well/Not At All-3%. Blacks: Very Well-67%, Well-27% and Not Well/Not At All-6%. Hispanics: Very Well-46%, Well-22% and Not Well/Not At All-32% In this analysis, only Hispanics reported a high percentage, 32 percent, or 5.3 million adults, who thought they could not read English Well or Very Well, no doubt reflecting the large immigrant population in this category with less education and poorer English language skills than U. S. born adults. Among both Blacks and Whites, poor reading appears to be a perceived problem for only 3 to 6 percent of these populations, about 4.5 million adults in the age range 16-59. Sub-cultural niches for literacy When the average proficiencies of Whites and Blacks on the NALS Prose scale were compared, it was found that for Whites who rated themselves as reading Very Well, their average Prose proficiency was 308, whereas for Blacks rating themselves as reading Very Well, their Prose average proficiency was 259. On the Quantitative scale, Whites rating themselves as reading Well scored 278 on the NALS , while Blacks who rated themselves as reading Well scored 221, near the lower end of the NALS scale. This indicates that two sub-cultural groups may both rate themselves as about equally competent in terms of their self-perceived reading abilities, even though their measured competence may differ as much as a full standard deviation on standardized literacy tests. This suggests an adaptive function within each sub-cultural group to the ambient literacy abilities and demands of each sub-group as its members encounter and perceive them. It would seem to be a useful activity to find out more about these cultural and sub-cultural phenomena with regard to the differences between adults' measured literacy abilities and their self-perceptions of their literacy abilities, and to use this information to better understand the scale of need and desire for adults to participate in adult education and literacy programs. This may be even more important in light of the fact that the NALS indicated that some 10 million adults were such poor readers that they could not even take the exam. While this might not be a national crisis for a nation with some 200 million adults, it is a national disgrace that so little is being done to help these adults help themselves and their families. With combined state and federal funding for the adult education and literacy programs operating under the Workforce Investment Act, Title 2, Adult Education and Family Literacy below a woeful $800 per enrollee, this is poverty level funding for the education of our most difficult to reach and educate citizens. It seems to me to be a national shame to spend billions of dollars to leave no children behind, while largely ignoring the desperate need of the children's parents and leaving them behind. How can this be an inspiration to children to pursue their own education? How can parents who cannot read be their childrens first reading teachers? Conceivably, if we invested more in the education of poorly educated adults, we could influence the educability of the adults children. Thomas G. Sticht International Consultant in Adult Education 2062 Valley View Blvd. El Cajon, CA 92019-2059 Tel/fax: (619) 444-9133 Email: tsticht at aznet.net
More information about the Assessment mailing list |