all

A bottom-up, field (practitioner and learner) - represented set of
standards?  Sounds like EFF, no?  What am I missing here?  We have this
rich, useful resource in EFF.  Are we talking about starting over?
Something different?  Don't we have this already?  Aren't some of us
building on it?

Janet Isserlis


>> 

>> Some might think that what I propose is too top-down.  I would argue

>> that it could be very bottom-up if the field -- and adult learner

>> leaders -- are/have been/will be well-represented in setting the

>> standards, and if the modules can be be selected to meet specific

>> learner goals and contexts as well as to the standards.