[ContentStandards 110] Fwd: Re: [AAACE-NLA] Curriculum Policy Proposals
Aaron Kohring
akohring at utk.edu
Thu Apr 6 09:24:12 EDT 2006
The message below is cross-posted from the National Literacy Advocacy
Discussion List. It talks about some of the work in Pennsylvania in
developing standards for curriculum.
Aaron
>Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:14:27 -0400
>From: "Martin E. Senger" <mesenger at netbox.com>
>Subject: Re: [AAACE-NLA] Curriculum Policy Proposals
>Sender: aaace-nla-bounces at lists.literacytent.org
>To: 'National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE'
> <aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org>
>Cc: mpeters at gecac.org, Sara Brennen <sbrennen at pennswoods.net>,
> "Westover, Michael" <mwestover at state.pa.us>
>Reply-to: National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE
> <aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org>
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>X-BeenThere: aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org
>Delivered-to: lists.literacytent.org-aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org
>Thread-index: AcZYlGzG0hBqshhTTZO+8lQi8CHWIAAyXSyA
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
> azog.silicongoblin.com
>X-Spam-Status: hits=0 tests= ver=3.1.0
>X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 07:46:09 -0400
>X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 160.36.0.85
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>List-Post: <mailto:aaace-nla at lists.literacytent.org>
>List-Subscribe: <http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla>,
> <mailto:aaace-nla-request at lists.literacytent.org?subject=subscribe>
>List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla>,
> <mailto:aaace-nla-request at lists.literacytent.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.literacytent.org/pipermail/aaace-nla>
>List-Help: <mailto:aaace-nla-request at lists.literacytent.org?subject=help>
>List-Id: National Literacy Advocacy List sponsored by AAACE
> <aaace-nla.lists.literacytent.org>
>Original-recipient: rfc822;akohring at mail.utk.edu
>
>Pax et bonum all! (peace & goodness)
>
>I teach Adult ESL for a non-profit in northwest PA (GECAC), and I am
>currently involved in a three-year project with the PA Dept of Education
>(PDE) to develop statewide curriculum standards. We are in the third year of
>the program, implementation. We have spent the last two years establishing
>and defining what we wanted in our standards, using Maryland and Arizona's
>standards as a starting place.
>
>You should know that the group of about 20 who participated is made up of
>ALL adult ESL teachers from across PA and from a variety of agencies, so we
>make up a good representation of the professional field in the state.
>
>Our basic goal was to create a document that would give both novice and
>experienced teachers a basic "guideline" of subjects to teach and times to
>teach them. We avoided it being too "prescriptive." We spent a long time
>hashing out the exact schedule, especially when it came to teaching grammar.
>But we had an excellent group, and we worked it out. We used six main
>sections: (in no particular order) Speaking, Listening, Writing, Reading,
>Pronunciation and Grammar. We also listed cultural and civic aspects for
>each level.
>
>We used the new NRS levels: Beginning Literacy, Beginning, Low Intermediate,
>High Intermediate, and Advanced.
>
>We aligned our standards to NRS, CASAS and BEST. I have since returned to my
>own previous assessments (BEST) for my students, and aligned them to our
>standards. It has been very helpful in seeing exact scores for each of the
>six sections.
>
>We discussed at the beginning that we could never form a comprehensive and
>prescriptive curriculum due to the fact that takes way too much power out of
>the teacher's hands. We stressed that these are suggestions, since the
>teacher should know what is best for the student.
>
>But we also underscored the desire that when a student changed agencies (in
>Erie, that happens on a daily basis), all the agencies would be literally
>"reading off the same page" when it came to assessing students' levels.
>
>I hope I have done the PA Curriculum Standards justice in this brief
>description!
>
>Martin E. Senger
>Adult ESL Teacher
>The R. Benjamin Wiley Learning Center/GECAC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: aaace-nla-bounces at lists.literacytent.org
>[mailto:aaace-nla-bounces at lists.literacytent.org] On Behalf Of David Rosen
>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:53 PM
>To: National by AAACE Literacy Advocacy List sponsored
>Subject: [AAACE-NLA] Curriculum Policy Proposals
>
>AAACE-NLA and Program Leadership Colleagues,
>
> From time to time government agencies at the federal and state level
>fund programs to develop curricula. For example, for several years,
>through the U.S. Department of Education's Workplace Education
>Program, federal grants supported the development of workplace-
>specific or industry-specific basic skills (including ELL) curriculum
>for workers. I think that it is useful for federal, state and local
>government agencies to fund curriculum development. I wish they
>would fund more curriculum projects, both generic and industry-
>specific, in all areas of adult education and literacy (which
>includes ELL and numeracy.)
>
>However, there are two things I would like to see government agencies
>require, that grantees:
>
>1. Develop the curriculum against a set of curriculum standards or
>frameworks. Given that we do not have federally-approved standards,
>national curriculum projects should use EFF standards, SCANS
>competencies, or possibly CASAS competencies, or a set of state-
>approved curriculum frameworks. State and local curriculum projects
>could use state-approved curriculum standards. Exceptions could be
>made for curriculum projects which use a participatory curriculum
>development model where a curriculum is developed from the
>interaction of a teacher and a particular group of students, growing
>from that particular group of students' needs.
>
>2. Publish the curriculum in a government-sponsored curriculum
>database on the Web where anyone (especially teachers) could quickly
>find it, using a set of adult education curriculum categories, and or
>search terms.
>
>I have recently been searching for some specific workplace
>curriculum, and have been surprised to find how much time it takes to
>chase it down. I am sure this curriculum exists; it is just not easy
>to find. And when I have found it, it is rare that the curriculum
>was developed against a set of curriculum standards, or at least it
>isn't clear what the curriculum standards are. I have often found
>that the curriculum is no longer in print.
>
>Why do I bring this up here? There are two reasons:
>
>1) This is a public policy issue. I would like to see the U.S.
>Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Labor, HUD, and other
>federal government agencies, and all state agencies which fund adult
>education and literacy curriculum development adopt this as a policy.
>It would add value to government-funded projects if others could
>benefit from the curriculum development work. It would not cost much
>to create this web-based database or to maintain it.
>
>2) I would like to hear your reactions to these proposals, for
>example from a program improvement (curriculum improvement is part of
>program leadership) and from a public policy perspective.
>
>David J. Rosen
>Adult Literacy Advocate
>djrosen at theworld.com
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AAACE-NLA mailing list: AAACE-NLA at lists.literacytent.org
>http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla
>LiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for literacy
>http://literacytent.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>AAACE-NLA mailing list: AAACE-NLA at lists.literacytent.org
>http://lists.literacytent.org/mailman/listinfo/aaace-nla
>LiteracyTent: web hosting, news, community and goodies for literacy
>http://literacytent.org
Aaron Kohring
Coordinator, LINCS Literacy & Learning Disabilities Special Collection
(http://ldlink.coe.utk.edu/)
Moderator, National Institute for Literacy's Content Standards Discussion
List (http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Contentstandards)
Coordinator, Equipped for the Future Websites (http://eff.cls.utk.edu/)
Center for Literacy Studies, University of Tennessee
EFF Center for Training and Technical Assistance
Phone:(865) 974-4109 main
(865) 974-4258 direct
Fax: (865) 974-3857
e-mail: akohring at utk.edu
More information about the ContentStandards
mailing list
|
|