National Institute for Literacy
 

[EnglishLanguage 2353] Re: Language learning and children

robinschwarz1 at aol.com robinschwarz1 at aol.com
Thu May 8 12:33:13 EDT 2008



That statement is a large simplification of the process, but neurologically speaking, those who study brains say that the older the brain is when exposed to sounds it does not regularly hear, the harder it is for the brain to hear the sounds AS A NATIVE SPEAKER DOES and then translate those into speech gestures.   This means some very fine gradations as to what is "native perception" vs really good perception of a good language learner.   I am just passing on what I read in the research.  I think it is important to know this so that teaching methods can respond more realistically to what the adult brain can do. 

While you know many who have learned language later very successfully, I, in my work, have seen thousands who cannot learn successfully and whose teachers continue to "talk at them" instead of working to help learners hear critical sounds more accurately, a practice almost no child learner ever needs. 

Clearly the range of language learning is as wide as the humanity trying to learn languages.  My concern lies with people who have been, for example, in this country for 20 years or more, often working in jobs where they ARE exposed to speakers of English,  and who cannot understand nor be understood in simple conversation in English; those who have been in beginning ESOL classes for many YEARS, not months, and whose needs are not well understood.  

 Robin Lovrien Schwarz







-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Kaufmann <steve at thelinguist.com>
To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>
Sent: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:41 am
Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2339] Language learning and children









For what it is worth I do not believe that
"if a child is not exposed to a sound in the
first three years of life, then the ability for the brain to recognize that
sound later (when learning a second language) is limited, or even precluded."
I simply know too many exceptions to that rule, including myself. It is not true for all. It may be true for some.

I believe that the brain is a Darwinian space. If a child is exposed to more than one language, this will develop an ability to process the sounds and structure of that language to some extent. If that is not continued this ability will decline. But reviving that ability will be easier, I believe, than starting from scratch. In either case, the motivation of the learner, the willingness to project oneself into the position of a speaker of another language, the position of a member of another cultural community,this attitude will be the most important factor. If a child can enjoy stories of another culture, and can enjoy the music and structure of another language, this will prepare the child for serious study later.


As Rubem Alves, famous Brazilian educator said


Se o conhecimento científico  de anatomia fosse condição para se fazer amor, os professores de  anatomia seriam amantes insuperáveis. Se o conhecimento acadêmico  da gramática fosse condição para se fazer literatura, os  gramáticos seria escritores insuperáveis.
Mas essa não é a verdade. ... 

Gramática se faz com palavras mortas. Literatura se faz com palavras vivas.



"If the scientific knowledge of anatomy were a condition for making
love, professors of anatomy would be unrivaled lovers. If the academic
knowledge of grammar were a condition for making literature,
grammarians would be unrivaled writers. But this is not the case.....



Grammar is made with words that are dead. Literature is made with words that are alive."
So let's teach the love of the language, not the academic details.

Steve














On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Martin Senger <MSenger at gecac.org> wrote:































Pax all!



 



I think I should clarify what I am
proposing. I was just wondering if someone passively exposed a child (less than
three years of age) to the sounds of different languages, would that child
retain the ability to recognize those sounds later
in life. Some research states that if a child is not exposed to a sound in the
first three years of life, then the ability for the brain to recognize that
sound later (when learning a second language) is limited, or even precluded.



 



Also, to play devil's advocate,
would passive learning on a limited basis (recorded samples of a language)
provide any long-term benefit for second language acquisition? I am not a
researcher, nor a holder of advanced degrees; I am simply an ESL teacher with a
curious mind!



 






Martin E. Senger



Adult ESL Teacher



GECAC / The R. Benjamin
Wiley Learning Center




Erie, Pa







 



-----Original Message-----

From:
englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Martin Senger


Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 2:07 PM


To: The Adult English Language
Learners Discussion List

Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2331]
Multiple language learning



 



Pax all!



 



Praised be for the
Internet! I did a quick google, and found the tem "hypnopedia." It
refers explicitly to learning while sleeping. While pretty much debunked for general
learning, I saw nothing which talks strictly about sound processing. Just from
my own experience, there may be something to it. I know, from the
aforementioned 4 & 2-year olds, if they make even the slightest
"odd" sound while I am sleeping, I am instantly wide awake. I then
listen intently (hence the "wide awake") to hear any follow-up
sounds worth investigating. So, that must mean my brain is in some way
processing some sounds.



 



Now I am not saying you
could learn another "language" while sleeping, but is it possible
that we could introduce, or maybe even "teach" new language sounds
to the sleeping brain? What say you?



 






Martin E. Senger



Adult ESL Teacher



GECAC / The R. Benjamin Wiley Learning Center




Erie, Pa







 



-----Original Message-----

From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov
[mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov] On
Behalf Of Andrea Canter

Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 1:04 PM


To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov

Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2328]
Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 32, Issue 15



 



Robin,



Are their books pretty accessible to lay-people?



Andrea










On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:23 AM,
<englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>
wrote:



Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions to

       englishlanguage at nifl.gov



To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

       http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

       englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov



You can reach the person managing the list at

       englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov



When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage digest..."





Today's Topics:



  1. [EnglishLanguage 2322] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 32,

     Issue 6 (robinschwarz1 at aol.com)





----------------------------------------------------------------------



Message: 1

Date: Mon, 05 May 2008
22:38:24 -0400

From: robinschwarz1 at aol.com

Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2322] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 32,

       Issue 6

To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov

Message-ID: <8CA7D3963B24F38-A40-24F7 at webmail-me15.sysops.aol.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"





 Andrea--there is a whole field devoted to multiple language acquisition.?
Two researchers who have written or edited books about this are De Angelis and
Selinker--they published one in 2001 and another in 2007.?



Robin Schwarz















-----Original Message-----

From: Andrea Canter <lucidpandora at gmail.com>

To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov

Sent: Sat, 3 May 2008 9:11 pm

Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2315] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 32, Issue 6



















I am curious how 3rd and 4th language learning differs from 2nd language
learning. In my own experience, once I started learning beyond the second
language I found myself getting all my languages confused. I would think and
say words in French when I was trying to speak German and vice versa. This is
good in respect to exercising the ability to think in another language, but obviously
very cumbersome. Is this normally what happens? Is there ANY research on it at
all?





Andrea Canter







On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:18 PM,  <englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>
wrote:





Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions to



 ? ? ? ?englishlanguage at nifl.gov







To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit



 ? ? ? ?http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage



or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to



 ? ? ? ?englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov







You can reach the person managing the list at



 ? ? ? ?englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov







When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific



than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage digest..."











Today's Topics:







 ? 1. [EnglishLanguage 2304] Re: Minimal pairs (robinschwarz1 at aol.com)



 ? 2. [EnglishLanguage 2305] Re: Minimal pairs (Michael Tate)











----------------------------------------------------------------------







Message: 1



Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 17:10:27 -0400



From: robinschwarz1 at aol.com



Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2304] Re: Minimal pairs



To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov



Message-ID: <8CA7AB013B6B464-9C0-228A at webmail-dd18.sysops.aol.com>



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"











?See the work of Virginia Kuhl at the U of Washington, who is a neuroscientist,
as well as the work of Norman Segalowitz, and his colleagues Gatbonton and
Trofimovich, who do studies on adult language acquisition for starters. This
latter group, especially Gatbonton, have theories about the progression of acquisition
of phonological information (i.e. sounds) in language acquisition. Gatbonton's
framework shows that this acquisition is gradual and predictable and subject to
exposure to native language speakers. ? These researchers do not comment on the
brain's ability to process language sounds. ?











I find one has to dig deep in the literature of neuroscience to find the
information on how the brain processes language sounds as it matures, but Kuhl
is recognized as one of the lead researchers on this process.? It has been very
frustrating to me that ESL as a field tends to ignore neuroscience and its
information on how the brain learns language(s) as well as the information
coming out of international reading research, which now also includes studies
on the brain and how languages are differentiated in it.? In addition, I feel
that the whole field of multiple language acquisition is equally ignored.?
Acquiring a third or fourth language is a very different process from acquiring
a second language.? As near as I can tell, a very large percentage, maybe the
majority, of our adult ESOL learners already speak two or more languages when
they begin to learn English, so I feel we should be looking at the field of
multiple language acquisition much more than at second language a









?cquisition .??







Robin Lovrien Schwarz































-----Original Message-----



From: Sally Bishop <s.bishop at aggiemail.usu.edu>



To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>



Sent: Fri, 2 May 2008 3:46 pm



Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2301] Re: Minimal pairs







































Do you have research you can site on this comment: "



Bear in mind, however, that neuroscience and many decades of SLA
study



are clear on the fact that adults will not acquire very accurate



pronunciation of foreign sounds because the brain of an adult language



learner does not process unfamiliar sounds effectively and does not



translate them into speech gestures ( i.e. pronunciation) accurately



anymore.?? Thus accents."







S Bishop











On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:46 PM, ?<robinschwarz1 at aol.com> wrote:



















?An even better book for minimal pairs is Pronunciation Contrasts in English (
Nilsen & Nilsen) available in both old and new editions at
Amazon.com./textbooks.? This book has ONLY minimal pairs of all contrasts in
English and each page includes a) a list of languages for which that particular
contrast is a problem, b) drawings of the mouth in both positions (actually
side views) c) a set of minimal pair sentences with context d) a set of
sentences with no context help (e.g. There is a bug/bag on the table.)?? and e)
a complete list of all minimal pairs for that contrast.? It is an invaluable
teaching resource.? Pronunciation Pairs is a good place to start if you are
unfamiliar with the practice of minimal pairs, but it does not go far enough
for review and mastery.? Learners typically memorize the contrasting words in
the pairsin that book in lightning time, but do not generalize that skill to o







?ther pairs, in my experience.















I teach minimal pairs for the purpose of phoneme isolation and manipulation
(auditory perception) -- a by-product of that instruction is better
pronunciation.? I? know there has been discussion here previously about the
effectiveness of MPs out of context.? I do both-- a lot of non-contextualized
practice and a LOT of contextualized practice, and have always seen a clear
improvement--and learners report clear improvement.? Teachers I coach who use
this say their learners BEG for this practice. When teachers use this, or I use
this approach, I emphasize that it is NOT a vocabulary exercise, but rather an
auditory discrimination practice and practice in associating specific sounds
with specific spellings.? Students often resist not knowing the meanings, but
the minute you include meanings, the listening part goes away.? Different brain
pathways are in play.??























Bear in mind, however, that neuroscience and many decades of SLA study are
clear on the fact that adults will not acquire very accurate pronunciation of
foreign sounds because the brain of an adult language learner does not process
unfamiliar sounds effectively and does not translate them into speech gestures
( i.e. pronunciation) accurately anymore.?? Thus accents.?























An interesting study on adult Japanese showed that adults COULD learn to say L
vs r? more accurately in a study environment, but could not generalize the new
skill to informal conversation.? Nonetheless, pronunciation experts ARE able to
achieve improvement, if not perfection.? There are LOTS of pronunciation aids
out there- videos, software, etc--Rosetta Stone has a feature where learners
can see a visigraph of what they say compared to a native model.? Learners LOVE
this and it apparently helps a LOT.?? I heard a terrific presenter at the ACE
of Florida conference last fall
who does adult ESL pronunciation improvement. She uses LOTS of minimal pair
practice and she emphasized the fact that to achieve improvement, you must do
100% correction.? That is, no error goes unnoticed and uncorrected. This is
essentially what the study on Japanese did as well.? Obviously, you must have your
learners' buy-in to do that or they will cry in fr







?ustr



?ation.?? She does it as part of a pronunciation improvement course where
learners are there precisely to have their speech corrected. ?















Mirrors are GREAT, as are "whisperphones"--those devices which look
like telephone receivers into which the learner speaks and can hear him or
herself saying sounds. Adult learners typically cannot hear that they are not
producing the sounds you want them to.??























Don't forget as well, that speech pathologists can help a LOT in showing
learners how to place tongue and lips for more accurate pronunciation (as long
as they do not characterize speech differences that are the result of first
language differences as "speech impediments" or speech problems--these
are normal speech differences.). ? I have urged for over 20 years that adult
ESL should be working more closely with speech pathologists? to help learners
hear and pronounce better and to help determine if there really ARE
pronunciation problems even in first language.??























Robin Lovrien Schwarz































































-----Original Message-----







From: Ted Klein <taklein at austin.rr.com>







To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>







Sent: Fri, 2 May 2008 9:47 am







Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2295] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,Issue 18



















































































Emma,



















?



















May I suggest that?listening procedures in teaching vowel and



consonant contrasts may be more important than pushing students into immediate



repetition. A basic principle in phonological exercises of any kind is that



listening and identification of sounds is of primary importance



before attempting repetition. If a student can't discriminate



the differences between two sounds, early attempts to produce them cause the



students to hear their own voices and those of other class members nearby,?



reinforcing existing problems. Identifying numerically seems to be the easiest



and quickest route. If students can't correctly hear the sounds, particularly



vowel sounds, they really can't make them. One of the problems with English is



that we have more vowel and diphthong sounds than most languages we deal with



and they are produced closer together. For example, Spanish has only one



high-front vowel sound, that of "piso" and it is between the English
beat and



bit sounds. I also have found that if we teach minimal pair listening in single



words first, they should be followed by minimal sentences and then put into an



open environment for speaking practice. Here is a sample exercise?for the



same sounds that you gave, in medial position. Notice that consonants after the



vowels are different, because of the fact that in English syllable length



changes according to the consonants that follow:? beat (short) beef (half



long) bead (long) and bees (very long). Try it. Most students have the most



problems distinguishing the longer syllables. In Spanish, for example, all



syllables remain short. Initial priority should always be given to the ears.























?



















?































MEDIAL



VOWEL EXERCISE-1 & 2-Track 6



















?



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



-/i/-1???????????????????????????????????????????????????



-/I/-2



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



heat?????????????????????????????????????????????????????



hit



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



cease???????????????????????????????????????????????????



sis



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



heed????????????????????????????????????????????????????



hid



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



keen????????????????????????????????????????????????????



kin



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



Lee's???????????????????????????????????????????????????



Liz



















???????????????????????























???????????????????????????????????



bead????????????????????????????????????????????????????



bid



















?



















???????????????????



It was a great heat.??????????????????????????????



It was a great hit.



















?



















I saw a



cease fire?????????????????????????????????



I saw sis fire.



















?



















We heed



it.??????????????????????????????????????????



We hid it.



















?



















They



were keen.??????????????????????????????????



They were kin.



















?



















It was



Lee's.????????????????????????????????????????



It was Liz.



















?



















See the



bead.??????????????????????????????????????



See the bid.



















???????????????????????























???????



Don't hit it, heat it.



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



Will your sis ever cease?



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



We heed it and they hid it.



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



I'm keen to know her kin.



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



Liz is at Lee's house.



















?



















???????????????????????????????????



We bid on the bead.



















?



























?



















Here are the procedures that I use with my students. Vowel numbers are



permanent and used to identify sounds all of the time. Beat and bit happen to



have the permanent numbers one?and two:??



















?



















?































1. Put the pairs of words and



their identifiers on the marker board. Students are encouraged to copy these



words in their notebooks, but are not given copies of the complete exercises.



Students are encouraged to tape any exercises in class, rather than practice



from the written language. My students receive an audio compact disk of all



vowel sounds on their first day.



















?



















2. The instructor should repeat



these pairs of words with numbers both horizontally and vertically for



familiarization. Vowel numbers will remain consistent with numbers used in the



vowel hatches.



















?



















3. The instructor will go to the



back of the room and call out words at random for the students to identify



numerically. This identification exercises can be done as both group and



individual exercises.? Example: HIT



2,? HEAT 1, HEAT 1, CEASE? 1, SIS 2, etc. If numerical errors are



heard, call out the correct number. When a majority of the students are able to



call the numbers correctly, change to double words at random. HEAT HEAT 1,



1,? HIT HEAT? 2, 1,? HIT? HIT 2, 2. HIT HEAT, 2, 1. etc.



















?



















4. After most of the students are



responding accurately to the minimal pairs, switch to the minimal sentence
pairs. These sentence



exercises should all be performed without written reference. First repeat



the sentences while the students listen. Next read the sentences at



unpredictable random and have the students identify target words in a sentence



environment numerically. This will be more difficult, but will help the
students



to hear the sounds in a real structural environment. Continue this exercise
with



the group and with individuals.



















?



















Example:? It was a great heat. (1) It was a great



hit (2) It was a great hit (2), etc.



















?



















5. Finally give the students oral



practice with?sentences in which the target sounds are in free



environments.? "Don't hit it, heat



it." Occasional corrections should be done gently, diplomatically and in
good



humor. If vowels 1, 3, 8 and 10 sound "flat" students can be
instructed on how



to make their mouth and throat muscles tense. To strengthen the oral and throat



muscles takes time. Tongue twisters, "trabalenguas," which combine or
emphasize



target sounds, are useful and students often enjoy and memorize them.



















?



















Vowel Numbers:? 1



beat??? 2? bit??? 3?



bait??? 4? bet??? 5? bat?? 6



bot (fly)??? 7?bought???8 boat??



9?book?? 10 boot?? 11. but



















Diphthong



Numbers???



6+2???lied????6+9??



loud????? 7+2??? Lloyd?



















?



















Cheers,?? Ted



















www.tedklein-ESL.com???























?????????????????????????????????????











































?











































?



















----- Original Message -----











From: "Emma Bourassa" <ebourassa at tru.ca>



















To: <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>



















Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008
5:41 PM



















Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2294] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,Issue



18












































>I believe it is Pronunciation Pairs that has illustrations,




single word and short dialogue practice. For example there might be:








>




sit? seat








> bit? beat









>









> etc. which is then worked




into a conversation:








> A: Bea, have a seat.









> B: I can eat but




can't sit.








> A: Sit in the seat, and eat your meat.









> B: No, I




need to knit.








> sorta silly but they do work for slow practice of moving




the mouth and tongue around.








> Pictures with mirrors so students can




watch themselves works well.








> e









>









> Emma Bourassa









>




English as a Second or Additional Language/ Teaching English as a Second



Language Instructor








> ESL Department









> Thompson Rivers




University








> 900 McGill Road. P.O.

Box 3010








> Kamloops, B.C. V2C




5N3








> (250) 371-5895









> fax 371-5514









> ebourassa at tru.ca









>









>>>>













> From: Andrea Canter <lucidpandora at gmail.com>









> To:




<englishlanguage at nifl.gov>








>




Date: 29/04/2008 12:03 pm








> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2292] Re:




EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31, Issue 18








>









> Jenny,









>













> Eek! That's the issue I'm coming up against soon. The way I've been




doing it








> works with the roman alphabet (and easiest with just one native




language in








> the group). I have this book that has Spanish translations




of English








> vocabulary words. Then it has the pronunciation of the word




spelled out in








> Spanish phonetics. I just borrow those phonetics for any




word I come across:








> (ex. Raise your hand = reiz yor jand). Sometimes




there isn't a sound in








> Spanish that quite matches the one in English and




I have to wrk around it








> (ex. the word 'sit'.... there isn't anything in




Spanish that sounds like the








> 'i' in that word.... I told my class it




sounds some where between 'eh' and








> 'ee' and they got it).









>













> The thing with non-Roman alphabets is unless you speak the language,




it








> would be quite a task to do it that way. Then if you have people




with








> differing languages, it would be even worse. If all the people in




your class








> know the Roman alphabet, then I have a link to a website that




has books and








> workshops on a unique system to teach pronunciation with.




I haven't tried








> the method, but it looks really cool. Let me know if you




want the address.








> Hope this (any of it) helps!









>









>




Andrea








>









> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008

at 12:00 PM, <englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>



wrote:








>









>> Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions




to








>>??????? englishlanguage at nifl.gov













>>









>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,




visit








>>??????? http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'




to








>>??????? englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov













>>









>> You can reach the person managing the list




at








>>??????? englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov













>>









>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is




more specific








>> than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage




digest..."








>>









>>









>> Today's




Topics:








>>









>>?? 1. [EnglishLanguage 2291]?




computerless ESL instruction








>>????? (Jenny




Hubler)








>>









>>









>>




----------------------------------------------------------------------








>>









>>




Message: 1








>> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:57:35 -0500









>> From:




"Jenny Hubler" <JHubler at womenscenter.info>








>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2291]? computerless ESL instruction








>>




To: "'The Adult English Language Learners Discussion



List'"








>>??????? <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>









>>




Message-ID: <001a01c8a937$d1da28d0$d600a8c0 at womenscenter.info>








>>




Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"








>>









>>




Andrea:








>>









>>









>>









>> Could you give more




details about how you teach pronunciation to speakers








>> of









>>




other languages? We have many Latinos, also some Koreans and a



student








>> from









>>




Sudan.








>>









>>









>>









>>




Jenny








>>









>> The Women's Center of Tarrant County,




TX








>>









>>









>>









>>?




_____








>>









>> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov













>> [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov]

On Behalf Of Andrea



Canter








>> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:58 PM









>> To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov









>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2290] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,



Issue








>> 16









>>









>>









>>









>> This is a




neat concept, but if you're like me and teach adults in venues








>>




without computers there needs to be something else. Since my class



is








>> entirely Hispanic, I use Spanish phonics to help. For some sounds




I have








>> to









>> go into further explanation because there is




no Spanish equivalent, but








>> for









>> the most part it




translates. This has worked SO well!! They have near








>> perfect




pronunciation instantly!! I'm getting ready to start a class with








>>




people from all over the world now. I have no idea how to address



the








>> issue









>> with them- any




suggestions??








>>









>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, <englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>









>>




wrote:








>>









>> Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions




to








>>?????? englishlanguage at nifl.gov













>>









>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,




visit








>>?????? http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'




to








>>?????? englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov













>>









>> You can reach the person managing the list




at








>>?????? englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov













>>









>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is




more specific








>> than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage




digest..."








>>









>>









>> Today's




Topics:








>>









>>? 1. [EnglishLanguage 2286] Re: on-line




dictionary with instant








>>???? sound (Molly




Elkins)








>>? 2. [EnglishLanguage 2287] Re: on-line dictionary with




instant








>>???? sound (Tom




Zurinskas)








>>? 3. [EnglishLanguage 2288] Re: on-line dictionary




with instant








>>???? sound (Elkins, Molly




(CR))








>>









>>









>>




----------------------------------------------------------------------








>>









>>




Message: 1








>> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:06:33 -0600









>> From:




"Molly Elkins" <melkins at dclibraries.org>








>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2286] Re: on-line dictionary with



instant








>>?????? sound









>> To:




"'The Adult English Language Learners Discussion



List'"








>>?????? <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>









>>




Message-ID: <004f01c8a62d$8c7cafe0$be070a0a at dpld.org>








>>




Content-Type: text/plain;??????



charset="us-ascii"








>>









>> I think it is pretty




interesting-








>>









>> My only concern is that it took some time




to load the sound- even on my








>> pretty fast computer, AND it has a




British accent. Many of my learners








>> have









>> complained




about media that is British instead of American



pronunciation.








>>









>> Thank you,









>>









>> Molly




Elkins








>> Literacy Specialist









>> Douglas County




Libraries








>> Phillip S. Miller Library









>>? 100 S. Wilcox




Street








>>? Castle Rock CO 80104









>>? Map









>>




Direct Phone: (303)688-7646








>> Alt Phone: (303) 791-READ









>>




Fax: (303) 688-7655








>> Email: melkins at dclibraries.org









>>




Web: www.DouglasCountyLibraries.org












>> -----Original Message-----









>> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov













>> [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov]

On Behalf Of Daphne



Greenberg








>> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:00 PM









>> To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov









>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2254] on-line dictionary with instant



sound








>>









>> ESL is not my area of expertise, so I don't know




if this site is good, or








>> if









>> it is a site that everyone




already knows about. A friend of mine








>> introduced









>> me to a




site described as? "An English Pronouncing Dictionary with



Instant








>> Sound" I tried it out with a few words, and it seemed like a




great idea








>> for









>> learners struggling with pronunciation of




specific words. They need to








>> have









>> some proficiency with




English spelling in order to use the site because








>> they









>>




need to write the word in order to hear it pronounced.








>>









>>




The url is:? http://howjsay.com/












>>









>> I am curious what people on this list think about this




site.








>>









>> Daphne









>>









>> Daphne




Greenberg








>> Associate Professor









>> Educational Psych. &




Special Ed.








>> Georgia State University









>> P.O. Box




3979








>> Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3979









>> phone:




404-413-8337








>> fax:404-413-8043









>> dgreenberg at gsu.edu









>>









>>




Daphne Greenberg








>> Associate Director









>> Center for the Study




of Adult Literacy








>> Georgia State University









>> P.O. Box




3977








>> Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3977









>> phone:




404-413-8337








>> fax:404-413-8043









>> dgreenberg at gsu.edu









>>




----------------------------------------------------








>> National




Institute for Literacy








>> Adult English Language Learners mailing




list








>> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









>>




To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to








>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>> Email delivered to melkins at dclibraries.org













>>









>>









>>









>>




------------------------------








>>









>> Message: 2









>>




Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:13:32 +0000








>> From: Tom Zurinskas <truespel at hotmail.com>









>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2287] Re: on-line dictionary with



instant








>>?????? sound









>> To:




The Adult English Language Learners Discussion



List








>>?????? <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>,

cornell



Kimble <cornell9 at earthlink.net>








>>




Message-ID: <BAY135-W4511FA4584E33E80584DDFD3DD0 at phx.gbl>








>>




Content-Type: text/plain;



charset="iso-8859-1"








>>









>>









>> m-w.com is a marvelous




dictionary that you can click on to hear words in








>> US









>>




accent.? The only nits I pick are what I call "awe-dropping" where



the








>> sound









>> "awe" is replaced sometimes by "ah".?




Click on the word "flaw" to hear it








>> correctly (note, the word "awe"




is said "ah").? Another nit is that words








>> starting with "ex-"




are said to be spoken as "ix-" (so example is








>> ixample).









>>




I don't think that is the norm in USA but perhaps UK.








>>









>>




Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL5+








>> See truespel.com -

and



the 4 truespel books plus "Occasional Poems" at








>>




authorhouse.com.








>>









>>









>>









>>









>>









>>





> From: melkins at dclibraries.org













>> > To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov









>>





> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:06:33 -0600









>> > Subject:




[EnglishLanguage 2286] Re: on-line dictionary with instant








>>




sound








>> >









>> > I think it is pretty




interesting-








>> >









>> > My only concern is that it took




some time to load the sound- even on my








>> > pretty fast computer,




AND it has a British accent. Many of my learners








>> have









>>





> complained about media that is British instead of American









>>




pronunciation.








>> >









>> > Thank you,









>>





>









>> > Molly Elkins









>> > Literacy




Specialist








>> > Douglas County Libraries









>> > Phillip S.




Miller Library








>> > 100 S. Wilcox Street









>> > Castle




Rock CO 80104








>> > Map









>> > Direct Phone:




(303)688-7646








>> > Alt Phone: (303) 791-READ









>> > Fax:




(303) 688-7655








>> > Email: melkins at dclibraries.org









>>





> Web: www.DouglasCountyLibraries.org













>> > -----Original Message-----









>> > From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov













>> > [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov]

On Behalf Of Daphne



Greenberg








>> > Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:00 PM









>> >




To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov












>> > Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2254] on-line dictionary with




instant sound








>> >









>> > ESL is not my area of expertise,




so I don't know if this site is good,








>> or









>> if









>>





> it is a site that everyone already knows about. A friend of




mine








>> introduced









>> > me to a site described as "An




English Pronouncing Dictionary with








>> Instant









>> > Sound"




I tried it out with a few words, and it seemed like a great idea








>>




for








>> > learners struggling with pronunciation of specific words.




They need to








>> have









>> > some proficiency with English




spelling in order to use the site because








>> they









>> > need




to write the word in order to hear it pronounced.








>> >









>>





> The url is: http://howjsay.com/













>> >









>> > I am curious what people on this list think




about this site.








>> >









>> > Daphne









>>





>









>> > Daphne Greenberg









>> > Associate




Professor








>> > Educational Psych. & Special Ed.









>> >




Georgia State University








>> > P.O. Box 3979









>> >




Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3979








>> > phone: 404-413-8337









>>





> fax:404-413-8043









>> > dgreenberg at gsu.edu









>>





>









>> > Daphne Greenberg









>> > Associate




Director








>> > Center for the Study of Adult Literacy









>>





> Georgia State University









>> > P.O. Box 3977









>> >




Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3977








>> > phone: 404-413-8337









>>





> fax:404-413-8043









>> > dgreenberg at gsu.edu









>> >




----------------------------------------------------








>> > National




Institute for Literacy








>> > Adult English Language Learners mailing




list








>> > EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









>>





> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go




to








>> > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>> > Email delivered to melkins at dclibraries.org









>>





>









>> >




----------------------------------------------------








>> > National




Institute for Literacy








>> > Adult English Language Learners mailing




list








>> > EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









>>





> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go




to








>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>> > Email delivered to truespel at hotmail.com













>>









>>




_________________________________________________________________








>>




Spell a grand slam in this game where word skill meets World Series.



Get








>> in









>> the game.









>>









>> http://club.live.com/word_slugger.aspx?icid=word_slugger_wlhm_admod_april08













>>









>> ------------------------------









>>









>>




Message: 3








>> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:26:53 -0600









>> From:




"Elkins, Molly (CR)" <melkins at dclibraries.org>








>>




Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2288] Re: on-line dictionary with



instant








>>?????? sound









>> To:




The Adult English Language Learners Discussion



List








>>?????? <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>









>>




Message-ID: <web-1497724 at bl-208.cluster1.echolabs.net>








>>




Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"








>>









>> An HTML




attachment was scrubbed...








>> URL:









>>









>> http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/englishlanguage/attachments/20080425/1599a44f/













>> attachment-0001.html<http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/englishlanguage/attachments/20080425/1599a44f/attachment-0001.html>


















>>









>>




------------------------------








>>









>>




----------------------------------------------------








>> National




Institute for Literacy








>> Adult English Language Learners mailing




list








>> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









>>




To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to








>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>>









>> End of EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31, Issue




16








>>




***********************************************








>>









>>









>>









>>




-------------- next part --------------








>> An HTML attachment was




scrubbed...








>> URL:









>> http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/englishlanguage/attachments/20080428/af65b6b0/attachment-0001.html


















>>









>> ------------------------------









>>









>>




----------------------------------------------------








>> National




Institute for Literacy








>> Adult English Language Learners mailing




list








>> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









>>




To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to








>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage













>>









>> End of EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31, Issue




18








>>




***********************************************








>>









>




----------------------------------------------------








> National Institute




for Literacy








> Adult English Language Learners mailing list









> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov









> To




unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage








>




Email delivered to taklein at austin.rr.com



































----------------------------------------------------







National Institute for Literacy







Adult English Language Learners mailing list







EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov







To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to







http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage







Email delivered to robinschwarz1 at aol.com







































Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com: America's #1 Mapping Site.















----------------------------------------------------







National Institute for Literacy







Adult English Language Learners mailing list







EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov







To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage







Email delivered to bishopsl at cc.usu.edu



















































----------------------------------------------------



National Institute for Literacy



Adult English Language Learners mailing list



EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov



To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to



http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage



Email delivered to robinschwarz1 at aol.com























-------------- next part --------------



An HTML attachment was scrubbed...



URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/englishlanguage/attachments/20080502/3793d041/attachment.html












------------------------------







Message: 2



Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:15:22 -0700



From: "Michael Tate" <mtate at sbctc.edu>



Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2305] Re: Minimal pairs



To: "The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List"



 ? ? ? ?<englishlanguage at nifl.gov>



Message-ID:



 ? ? ?
?<0CA6C79FCB4AC642A77B76C17A4316EE0317C444 at exch-1.sbctc2.local>



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"







Robin and others:















Unless one has had to learn to language with sounds that don't exist in



English, it can be very frustrating to watch students repeatedly fail at



making sounds that are very easy for fluent English speakers.















Here's a sound from Thai that is diabolically difficult for most English



speakers. ?Try saying "nga". ? Here's a tip for saying it correctly:



say "sing-a" and then ?drop all the other sounds except the /ng/



followed by short /a/. ? ?Once you think you have mastered it, try



saying it in the midst of ?a ?conversation .















Here's a tip for teaching l/r. ?Ask your ?students to find something



that's about as thin as a pencil that they are willing to put in their



mouths. ?Tell the students to put the straw or pencil ?or whatever



against the back of their front teeth. ?Give them some minimal pairs



with "l/r" at the beginning, middle and end of words: ?luck ruck,
mile



mire, etc. ?and that have the sounds in close proximity like "burlap"



"roller" , etc. ?To make the /l/ sound your tongue has to at least
touch



the back of your front teeth. (In some English dialects, the /l/ ?sound



that isn't in an accented syllable or that is in the final position,



your tongue may not have to actually touch your teeth, but it get very,



very close to touching.)















Having a pencil touching the back of the front teeth makes the student



hyper-aware if his/her tongue is touching the back of the teeth.



Modesty may require that some students cover their mouths with their



hands or ?a sheet of paper while doing this.















After considerable practice (months), students won't need the pencil.



They still may not be able to make the /l/ consistently, but they'll



know when they weren't able to make /l/.















From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov



[mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov]
On Behalf Of



robinschwarz1 at aol.com



Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 12:46 PM



To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov



Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2298] Re: Minimal pairs















An even better book for minimal pairs is Pronunciation Contrasts in



English ( Nilsen & Nilsen) available in both old and new editions at



Amazon.com./textbooks. ?This book has ONLY minimal pairs of all



contrasts in English and each page includes a) a list of languages for



which that particular contrast is a problem, b) drawings of the mouth in



both positions (actually side views) c) a set of minimal pair sentences



with context d) a set of sentences with no context help (e.g. There is a



bug/bag on the table.) ? and e) a complete list of all minimal pairs for



that contrast. ?It is an invaluable teaching resource. ?Pronunciation



Pairs is a good place to start if you are unfamiliar with the practice



of minimal pairs, but it does not go far enough for review and mastery.



Learners typically memorize the contrasting words in the pairsin that



book in lightning time, but do not generalize that skill to o ther



pairs, in my experience.







I teach minimal pairs for the purpose of phoneme isolation and



manipulation (auditory perception) -- a by-product of that instruction



is better pronunciation. ?I ?know there has been discussion here



previously about the effectiveness of MPs out of context. ?I do both-- a



lot of non-contextualized practice and a LOT of contextualized practice,



and have always seen a clear improvement--and learners report clear



improvement. ?Teachers I coach who use this say their learners BEG for



this practice. When teachers use this, or I use this approach, I



emphasize that it is NOT a vocabulary exercise, but rather an auditory



discrimination practice and practice in associating specific sounds with



specific spellings. ?Students often resist not knowing the meanings, but



the minute you include meanings, the listening part goes away.



Different brain pathways are in play.







Bear in mind, however, that neuroscience and many decades of SLA
study



are clear on the fact that adults will not acquire very accurate



pronunciation of foreign sounds because the brain of an adult language



learner does not process unfamiliar sounds effectively and does not



translate them into speech gestures ( i.e. pronunciation) accurately



anymore. ? Thus accents.







An interesting study on adult Japanese showed that adults COULD learn to



say L vs r ?more accurately in a study environment, but could not



generalize the new skill to informal conversation. ?Nonetheless,



pronunciation experts ARE able to achieve improvement, if not



perfection. ?There are LOTS of pronunciation aids out there- videos,



software, etc--Rosetta Stone has a feature where learners can see a



visigraph of what they say compared to a native model. ?Learners LOVE



this and it apparently helps a LOT. ? I heard a terrific presenter at



the ACE of Florida conference last fall who does adult ESL pronunciation



improvement. She uses LOTS of minimal pair practice and she emphasized



the fact that to achieve improvement, you must do 100% correction. ?That



is, no error goes unnoticed and uncorrected. This is essentially what



the study on Japanese did as well. ?Obviously, you must have your



learners' buy-in to do that or they will cry in frustr ation. ? She does



it as part of a pronunciation improvement course where learners are



there precisely to have their speech corrected.







Mirrors are GREAT, as are "whisperphones"--those devices which look
like



telephone receivers into which the learner speaks and can hear him or



herself saying sounds. Adult learners typically cannot hear that they



are not producing the sounds you want them to.







Don't forget as well, that speech pathologists can help a LOT in showing



learners how to place tongue and lips for more accurate pronunciation



(as long as they do not characterize speech differences that are the



result of first language differences as "speech impediments" or
speech



problems--these are normal speech differences.). ? I have urged for over



20 years that adult ESL should be working more closely with speech



pathologists ?to help learners hear and pronounce better and to help



determine if there really ARE pronunciation problems even in first



language.







Robin Lovrien Schwarz























-----Original Message-----



From: Ted Klein <taklein at austin.rr.com>



To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List



<englishlanguage at nifl.gov>



Sent: Fri, 2 May 2008 9:47 am



Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2295] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,Issue



18







Emma,















May I suggest that listening procedures in teaching vowel and consonant



contrasts may be more important than pushing students into immediate



repetition. A basic principle in phonological exercises of any kind is



that listening and identification of sounds is of primary importance



before attempting repetition. If a student can't discriminate the



differences between two sounds, early attempts to produce them cause the



students to hear their own voices and those of other class members



nearby, ?reinforcing existing problems. Identifying numerically seems to



be the easiest and quickest route. If students can't correctly hear the



sounds, particularly vowel sounds, they really can't make them. One of



the problems with English is that we have more vowel and diphthong



sounds than most languages we deal with and they are produced closer



together. For example, Spanish has only one high-front vowel sound, that



of "piso" and it is between the English beat and bit sounds. I also
have



found that if we teach minimal pair listening in single words first,



they should be followed by minimal sentences and then put into an open



environment for speaking practice. Here is a sample exercise for the



same sounds that you gave, in medial position. Notice that consonants



after the vowels are different, because of the fact that in English



syllable length changes according to the consonants that follow: ?beat



(short) beef (half long) bead (long) and bees (very long). Try it. Most



students have the most problems distinguishing the longer syllables. In



Spanish, for example, all syllables remain short. Initial priority



should always be given to the ears.























MEDIAL VOWEL EXERCISE-1 & 2-Track 6























 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-/i/-1



-/I/-2















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?heat



hit















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?cease



sis















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?heed



hid















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?keen



kin















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Lee's



Liz















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bead



bid















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?It was a great heat.



It was a great hit.















I saw a cease fire ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?I saw sis fire.















We heed it. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? We hid it.















They were keen. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? They were kin.















It was Lee's. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? It was Liz.















See the bead. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? See the bid.















 ? ? ? ?Don't hit it, heat it.















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Will your sis ever cease?















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?We heed it and they hid it.















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?I'm keen to know her kin.















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Liz is at Lee's house.















 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?We bid on the bead.























Here are the procedures that I use with my students. Vowel numbers are



permanent and used to identify sounds all of the time. Beat and bit



happen to have the permanent numbers one and two:























1. Put the pairs of words and their identifiers on the marker board.



Students are encouraged to copy these words in their notebooks, but are



not given copies of the complete exercises. Students are encouraged to



tape any exercises in class, rather than practice from the written



language. My students receive an audio compact disk of all vowel sounds



on their first day.















2. The instructor should repeat these pairs of words with numbers both



horizontally and vertically for familiarization. Vowel numbers will



remain consistent with numbers used in the vowel hatches.















3. The instructor will go to the back of the room and call out words at



random for the students to identify numerically. This identification



exercises can be done as both group and individual exercises. ?Example:



HIT 2, ?HEAT 1, HEAT 1, CEASE ?1, SIS 2, etc. If numerical errors are



heard, call out the correct number. When a majority of the students are



able to call the numbers correctly, change to double words at random.



HEAT HEAT 1, 1, ?HIT HEAT ?2, 1, ?HIT ?HIT 2, 2. HIT HEAT, 2, 1. etc.















4. After most of the students are responding accurately to the minimal



pairs, switch to the minimal sentence pairs. These sentence exercises



should all be performed without written reference. First repeat the



sentences while the students listen. Next read the sentences at



unpredictable random and have the students identify target words in a



sentence environment numerically. This will be more difficult, but will



help the students to hear the sounds in a real structural environment.



Continue this exercise with the group and with individuals.















Example: ?It was a great heat. (1) It was a great hit (2) It was a great



hit (2), etc.















5. Finally give the students oral practice with sentences in which the



target sounds are in free environments. ?"Don't hit it, heat it."



Occasional corrections should be done gently, diplomatically and in good



humor. If vowels 1, 3, 8 and 10 sound "flat" students can be
instructed



on how to make their mouth and throat muscles tense. To strengthen the



oral and throat muscles takes time. Tongue twisters, "trabalenguas,"



which combine or emphasize target sounds, are useful and students often



enjoy and memorize them.















Vowel Numbers: ?1 beat ? ?2 ?bit ? ?3 ?bait ? ?4 ?bet ? ?5 ?bat ? 6 bot



(fly) ? ?7 bought ? 8 boat ? 9 book ? 10 boot ? 11. but







Diphthong Numbers ? ?6+2 ? lied ? ?6+9 ? loud ? ? ?7+2 ? ?Lloyd















Cheers, ? Ted







www.tedklein-ESL.com































----- Original Message -----







From: "Emma Bourassa" <ebourassa at tru.ca>







To: <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>







Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 5:41 PM







Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2294] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,Issue



18
















>I believe it is Pronunciation Pairs that has illustrations, single word




and short dialogue practice. For example there might be:




> sit ?seat





> bit ?beat





>





> etc. which is then worked into a conversation:





> A: Bea, have a seat.





> B: I can eat but can't sit.





> A: Sit in the seat, and eat your meat.





> B: No, I need to knit.





> sorta silly but they do work for slow practice of moving the mouth and




tongue around.




> Pictures with mirrors so students can watch themselves works well.





> e





>





> Emma Bourassa





> English as a Second or Additional Language/ Teaching English as a




Second Language Instructor




> ESL Department





> Thompson Rivers

University




> 900 McGill Road. P.O.

Box 3010




> Kamloops, B.C. V2C 5N3





> (250) 371-5895





> fax 371-5514





> ebourassa at tru.ca





>





>>>>





> From: Andrea Canter <lucidpandora at gmail.com>





> To: <englishlanguage at nifl.gov>





> Date: 29/04/2008 12:03 pm





> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2292] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,




Issue 18




>





> Jenny,





>





> Eek! That's the issue I'm coming up against soon. The way I've been




doing it




> works with the roman alphabet (and easiest with just one native




language in




> the group). I have this book that has Spanish translations of English





> vocabulary words. Then it has the pronunciation of the word spelled




out in




> Spanish phonetics. I just borrow those phonetics for any word I come




across:




> (ex. Raise your hand = reiz yor jand). Sometimes there isn't a sound




in




> Spanish that quite matches the one in English and I have to wrk around




it




> (ex. the word 'sit'.... there isn't anything in Spanish that sounds




like the




> 'i' in that word.... I told my class it sounds some where between 'eh'




and




> 'ee' and they got it).





>





> The thing with non-Roman alphabets is unless you speak the language,




it




> would be quite a task to do it that way. Then if you have people with





> differing languages, it would be even worse. If all the people in your




class




> know the Roman alphabet, then I have a link to a website that has




books and




> workshops on a unique system to teach pronunciation with. I haven't




tried




> the method, but it looks really cool. Let me know if you want the




address.




> Hope this (any of it) helps!





>





> Andrea





>





> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008

at 12:00 PM, <englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>



wrote:




>





>> Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions to





>> ? ? ? ?englishlanguage at nifl.gov





>>





>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit





>> ? ? ? ?http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage





>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to





>> ? ? ? ?englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov





>>





>> You can reach the person managing the list at





>> ? ? ? ?englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov





>>





>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific





>> than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage digest..."





>>





>>





>> Today's Topics:





>>





>> ? 1. [EnglishLanguage 2291] ?computerless ESL instruction





>> ? ? ?(Jenny Hubler)





>>





>>





>>




----------------------------------------------------------------------




>>





>> Message: 1





>> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008

08:57:35 -0500




>> From: "Jenny Hubler" <JHubler at womenscenter.info>





>> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2291] ?computerless ESL instruction





>> To: "'The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List'"





>> ? ? ? ?<englishlanguage at nifl.gov>





>> Message-ID: <001a01c8a937$d1da28d0$d600a8c0 at womenscenter.info>





>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"





>>





>> Andrea:





>>





>>





>>





>> Could you give more details about how you teach pronunciation to




speakers




>> of





>> other languages? We have many Latinos, also some Koreans and a




student




>> from





>> Sudan.





>>





>>





>>





>> Jenny





>>





>> The Women's Center of Tarrant County, TX





>>





>>





>>





>> ?_____





>>





>> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov





>> [mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov




<mailto:englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov?>
] On Behalf Of Andrea Canter




>> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:58 PM





>> To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov





>> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 2290] Re: EnglishLanguage Digest, Vol 31,




Issue




>> 16





>>





>>





>>





>> This is a neat concept, but if you're like me and teach adults in




venues




>> without computers there needs to be something else. Since my class is





>> entirely Hispanic, I use Spanish phonics to help. For some sounds I




have




>> to





>> go into further explanation because there is no Spanish equivalent,




but




>> for





>> the most part it translates. This has worked SO well!! They have near





>> perfect pronunciation instantly!! I'm getting ready to start a class




with




>> people from all over the world now. I have no idea how to address the





>> issue





>> with them- any suggestions??





>>





>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, <englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov>





>> wrote:





>>





>> Send EnglishLanguage mailing list submissions to





>> ? ? ? englishlanguage at nifl.gov





>>





>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit





>> ? ? ? http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage





>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to





>> ? ? ? englishlanguage-request at nifl.gov





>>





>> You can reach the person managing the list at





>> ? ? ? englishlanguage-owner at nifl.gov





>>





>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific





>> than "Re: Contents of EnglishLanguage digest..."





>>





>>





>> Today's Topics:





>>





>> ?1. [EnglishLanguage 2286] Re: on-line dictionary with instant





>> ? ? sound (Molly Elkins)