
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[EnglishLanguage 5083] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
kolgin at glendale.edu
kolgin at glendale.eduMon Nov 2 10:07:22 EST 2009
- Previous message: [EnglishLanguage 5080] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
- Next message: [EnglishLanguage 5084] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> A little clarification: "whole language" is philosophy and "whole word"
is sight reading.
> England has abandoned "whole language" or "whole word" reading
> insrtruction for "synthetic phonics" . How's it going?
>
>
>
> Tom Zurinskas, USA - CT20, TN3, NJ33, FL7+
> see truespel.com phonetic spelling
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:09:49 +0000
>> From: N.Hann at leedsmet.ac.uk
>> To: englishlanguage at nifl.gov; englishlanguage at nifl.gov
>> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 5077] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> In England, an ESOL curriculum was put together around 2001 and learner
>> materials to support it followed a couple of years later. Here is a link
>> to the Adult ESOL Core Curriculum we refer to when planning courses etc.
>> It has been particularly useful for new teachers and had supporting
>> documents such as exemplars of learner language which helped tutors and
>> assessors/ exam bodies get a 'feel' for the levels.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a link to it http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk/sflcurriculum
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> with best wishes,
>>
>>
>>
>> Naeema
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Naeema B.Hann
>> PhD Candidate
>> Leslie Silver International Faculty
>> Macaulay Hall
>> Headingley Campus
>> Leeds Metropolitan University
>> Leeds LS6 3QS
>>
>>
>> ph. 0113-8129311
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: englishlanguage-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of Amber Gallup
>> Sent: Fri 30/10/2009 15:45
>> To: The Adult English Language Learners Discussion List
>> Subject: [EnglishLanguage 5076] a real curriculum vs. textbook
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello colleagues
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Im wondering if anybody out there has recently gone through the process
>> of designing or formalizing a leveled curriculum for their program
>> (instead of just using a textbook as a curriculum)? Would love to hear
>> about your experiences how you did it, what your process was, or just
>> what you learned or found challenging? A program around here is thinking
>> about doing just that, so I thought it would be good to hear what the
>> field has to say about it thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Amber Rodriguez
>>
>>
>> Riverdale, Maryland
>>
>> To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to
>> http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows 7: It works the way you want.
> http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen2:112009----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Adult English Language Acquisition mailing list
> EnglishLanguage at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/englishlanguage
> Email delivered to kolgin at glendale.edu
- Previous message: [EnglishLanguage 5080] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
- Next message: [EnglishLanguage 5084] Re: a real curriculum vs. textbook
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the EnglishLanguage discussion list



