Rochelle--

This would be a subheading under a purpose of , say, "Increasing 
literacy."

You are being kind--I'm trying to think this through.  What would we 
say about learning disabilities?  First would be something like:  "test 
and diagnose any learning disabilities."  This might be good to start 
with.

Now, on the research part--actually, we should compile what we DO know, 
so we know what we don't  have, what questions still need to be 
researched.

(Maybe i should go to bed.)

Thanks for asking this, an excellent exercise.

OK--literacy--do we need to define this?

Andrea

On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:38 PM, RKenyon721 at aol.com wrote:


>

> Andrea,

>  

> Why don't we look at Literacy and Learning Disabilities, the topic of 

> our Discussion List.  That will narrow the "field" considerably.

>  

> What do you think?

>  

> Rochelle

>  

>

>

> Hi Rochelle

>

> This is a great question.  First, it seems to me, we need to define 

> the scope of the field, its purpose, then we will be able to figure 

> out research questions.

>

> Andrea

>

>  

>  

>  

> Rochelle Kenyon, Ed.D., Project Trainer

> LD Academies Project

> 6315 Capstan Court

> Rockledge, Florida 32955-5765

> Telephone: 321.637.1319

> Fax: 321.637.1920

> Email: RKenyon721 at aol.com 

>  ----------------------------------------------------

> National Institute for Literacy

> Learning Disabilities mailing list

> LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov

> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to 

> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities

> Message sent to andreawilder at comcast.net.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2333 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/learningdisabilities/attachments/20070104/0f4edba2/attachment.bin