National Institute for Literacy
 

[LearningDisabilities 846] Re: New Dyslexia Theory Blames 'Noise'

Andrea Wilder andreawilder at comcast.net
Wed Jan 10 15:28:06 EST 2007


Rochelle--thanks for the calibre of this! I rely on you to give us the
best, fast, this is worth looking into.

Thanks!

Andrea
On Jan 10, 2007, at 3:03 PM, KC Andrew wrote:


> Hi Rochelle - I thought it was a fascinating premise (I saw is in

> Schwab Learning) and it confirmed some of my informal observations of

> how dyslexic people approach reading. However, I suspect that there

> may be room for both schools of thought (and probably more!) and what

> is causal for one dyslexic reader may not be true of all of them.

>

> KC Andrew

> Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges

> Adult Basic Education - Professional Development Services

> 360/485-2338

> kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu <mailto:kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu>

>

>

> ________________________________

>

> From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of

> RKenyon721 at aol.com

> Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 11:35 AM

> To: learningdisabilities at nifl.gov

> Subject: [LearningDisabilities 844] New Dyslexia Theory Blames 'Noise'

>

>

> Hello all,

>

> In the January 10, 2007 newsletter from Medical News Today, a article

> entitled New Dyslexia Theory Blames 'Noise' presents some interesting

> information from research funded by the National Institute of Child

> Health and Human Development. Below are some interesting sections

> from that article:

>

>

> The dyslexic brain struggles to read because even small distractions

> can throw it off, according to a new model of dyslexia emerging from a

> group of recent studies.

>

> The studies contradict an influential, 30-year-old theory that blamed

> dyslexia on a neural deficit in processing the fast sounds of

> language.

>

> Instead, the studies suggest that children with dyslexia have bad

> filters for irrelevant data. As a result, they struggle to form solid

> mental categories for identifying letters and word sounds.

>

> Such children may benefit from intensive training under "noisy"

> conditions to strengthen their mental templates, said University of

> Southern California neuroscientist Zhong-Lin Lu....

>

>

> "In terms of treatment, the results suggest that programs that foster

> the development of sharper perceptual categories for letters and

> letter sounds might be a good way to supplement existing dyslexia

> interventions," she added....

>

> Johannes Ziegler of the Universite de Provence in Marseille, France,

> was the lead author on a study of dyslexia and auditory noise

> published this year in Proceedings of the National Academy of

> Sciences.

>

> Ziegler said his results suggest that dyslexia stems from shaky

> categories for phonemes (the basic sounds of language).

>

> "In silence, information is often redundant and dyslexics get away

> with the perception deficit," Ziegler said in an e-mail. "In noise,

> however, they can no longer compensate.

>

> "What is important is that noisy environments are the rule and not the

> exception," he added, citing a study from South Bank University in the

> U.K. that found average noise levels in primary classrooms to be as

> high as near a busy intersection.

>

> "What Sperling and Lu's data suggest is that the mechanism responsible

> for faulty phonological development is quite general and has to do

> with attention in a broad sense.

>

> "This is a great paper of very high significance - As people like

> Steve Grossberg [of Boston University] have argued for many years,

> attention - is crucial for stable learning of categories."

>

> Ziegler called for preventive training for children with weak speech

> perception in noise in kindergarten or early primary grades, saying

> they are at greater risk for developing dyslexia....

>

>

>

>

>

> The above includes only a few short snapshots from the article. Has

> anyone read the entire article? I would be interested in hearing your

> thoughts about this important research and how it could impact the

> field.

>

> You can access the article at:

> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=59027&nfid=nl

>

> Thanks,

>

> Rochelle

>

>

> Rochelle Kenyon

> Moderator, LINCS Learning Disabilities Discussion List

> Center for Literacy Studies at the University of Tennessee

> RKenyon721 at aol.com

>

> To post a message:

> Learningdisabilities at nifl.gov

>

> To subscribe:

> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/LearningDisabilities

>

> To read archived messages:

> http://www.nifl.gov/linc/discussions/list_archives.html

> <winmail.dat>----------------------------------------------------

> National Institute for Literacy

> Learning Disabilities mailing list

> LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov

> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities

> Message sent to andreawilder at comcast.net.





More information about the LearningDisabilities mailing list