[LearningDisabilities 847] Re: New Dyslexia Theory Blames 'Noise'RKenyon721 at aol.com RKenyon721 at aol.comWed Jan 10 15:43:06 EST 2007
Hi KC and Andrea, I think this is so interesting and relevant as it came out just shortly after we had some discussion about research priorities. This certainly takes a real "hot topic" in the field and narrows it down to the least common denominators. The results of scholarly research affect practice. There were some interesting suggestions in the article that related to how it could affect instruction. Even though most research is done with children and has to be adapted for our adult population, it is still noteworthy. What do others think? Thanks, Rochelle Rochelle Kenyon Moderator, LINCS Learning Disabilities Discussion List Center for Literacy Studies at the University of Tennessee _RKenyon721 at aol.com_ (mailto:RKenyon721 at aol.com) To post a message: _Learningdisabilities at nifl.gov_ (mailto:Learningdisabilities at nifl.gov) Rochelle--thanks for the calibre of this! I rely on you to give us the best, fast, this is worth looking into. Thanks! Andrea Hi Rochelle - I thought it was a fascinating premise (I saw is in Schwab Learning) and it confirmed some of my informal observations of how dyslexic people approach reading. However, I suspect that there may be room for both schools of thought (and probably more!) and what is causal for one dyslexic reader may not be true of all of them. KC Andrew Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges Adult Basic Education - Professional Development Services 360/485-2338 _kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu_ (mailto:kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu) <mailto:kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/learningdisabilities/attachments/20070110/7562aa10/attachment.html
More information about the LearningDisabilities mailing list |