
Programs & Projects
The Institute is a catalyst for advancing a comprehensive national literacy agenda.
[LearningDisabilities 4223] Re: descrepancy model
Lucille Cuttler
l.cuttler at comcast.netMon Nov 2 18:40:48 EST 2009
- Previous message: [LearningDisabilities 4215] Re: descrepancy model
- Next message: [LearningDisabilities 4224] Re: descrepancy model
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brant, Thank you for your always concise and informative information.
The fact that the discreptancy model is flawed leads to the question: when
will the law be changed to be in accord with science. Specifically, mandate
that literacy instruction must start in the formative years.
The RTI model? where can I find more about that?
Lucille Cuttler
-----Original Message-----
From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov
[mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov]On Behalf Of Brant Hayenga
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:20 AM
To: 'The Learning Disabilities Discussion List'
Subject: [LearningDisabilities 4215] Re: descrepancy model
Nora:
Could someone explain to me the reasoning behind this method?
It's all about what the state regulations indicate. It is clearly not
logical. The IQ-discrepancy model has been widely demonstrated to be an
unreliable method for identifying students who have reading disabilities.
The discrepancy model has lots of problems, one of which is that it tends to
over identify higher IQ students, and under identify lower IQ students.
Articles about the problems were published in 1998, but many states continue
to at least include the discrepancy model in their regulations. After I read
the attached article, I was astonished that at the time (2005) most states
still required the use of the discrepancy method. We have to follow the
laws, even if they are deeply flawed. NM recently switched to an RtI model.
This regression
effect leads to observed discrepancies
that are larger, on average, than
the true discrepancy for individuals
with IQ scores above 100 and, therefore,
increases the chances that such
children will be identified as IQ discrepant.
For individuals scoring below
the mean on IQ, the opposite tendency
occurs, making the observed discrepancy
smaller than the true discrepancy,
on average, so that their chances for
identification as IQ discrepant are
reduced.
Brant Hayenga
Educational Diagnostician
Stapleton Elementary/Rio Rancho Middle School
(505) 896-0667 ext. 226 (District Office)
(505) 891-8473 ext. 519 (Stapleton Elementary)
bhayenga at rrps.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/learningdisabilities/attachments/20091102/05b0b8a4/attachment.html
- Previous message: [LearningDisabilities 4215] Re: descrepancy model
- Next message: [LearningDisabilities 4224] Re: descrepancy model
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the LearningDisabilities discussion list



