The MRI is a type of brain scan. How does the teacher know it isn't physical? And what does "physical" mean in this context? Not much. I would want to take my daughter to a specialist in reading assessments. 


Andrea 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Katherine Mercurio Gotthardt" <katherine.gotthardt at gmail.com> 
To: "The Learning Disabilities Discussion List" <learningdisabilities at nifl.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 1:27:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [LearningDisabilities 4247] Re: Brain research in education 

I just went to my daughter's parent/teacher conference yesterday, and once again, was disturbed about her reading level. She stayed back in Kindergarten and is now a fifth grader. Her reading and comprehension skills are between 2nd and 3rd grade, even with summer school and extra help over the summer. I asked the teacher if she thought I should take my daughter to have a second MRI to make sure nothing is wrong. The teacher didn't seem to think it was anything physical and assured me if she did think it was physical, she would have told me long ago. 

Can someone explain how a brain scan is different from an MRI? 


On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Nora Chahbazi < ooprc at comcast.net > wrote: 




I just received a brochure for a conference titled 'Smarter Brains: Using Brain Rearch to Raise IQ and Achievement' at the 25th Learning and the Brain Conference in Sanfrisco in Feb, 2001. Some of the workshop titles are" Neurointelligence and Education: Is it Time to Require Students to have a Brain Scan?" and 'What Neuroscience can teach us about Teaching' - along with many others. This is a perfect example of the feeling of confusion and frustration by those of us trying to teach reading or anything else! There has just been a disdcussion on this list about how neuroscience and education are not connected and then I am exposed to this conference that has 3 days of educating educators in the power of neuroscience in education. How does one choose who to believe? Maybe neuroscience in education is akin to snake oil, maybe it is the best thing since sliced bread. How would someone decipher the truth from 2 opposite camps proclaiming 'the truth'. I have found this phenomena to be a source of frustration throughout my journey of learning how to teach reading. Many research studies come to totally opposite conclusions about what is great and what is horrible amd damaging.(For example: Whole language is the answer! Phonics is the answer!......Teach them to memorize the words and the book to foster comprehension! They must have significant repetition/drill in phonemic awareness and phonics before ever reading a book!,.... Look at the picture to get meaning! Do not look at the picture; we don't read pictures! ..... Teach the phonics rules in order to read the words! Don't teach phonics rules because they are developmentally inappropriate and slow you down!..... You must learn the letter names to read! You do not use the letter names in reading!....and on an on) leaving the consumer to scratch their head and get mired in the confusion of all this conflicting information. Who does one believe? In the meantime, the numbers of poor/non readers of every age continue to eacalate. How do those on this list deal with this?! 
Thanks, 
Nora 



Nora Chahbazi, President 
EBLI Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction 
Ounce of Prevention Reading Center 
www.ebli.org 
810.732.4810 
fax 810.732.0366 

---------------------------------------------------- 
National Institute for Literacy 
Learning Disabilities mailing list 
LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov 
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities 
Email delivered to katherine.gotthardt at gmail.com 



-- 
Katherine Mercurio Gotthardt 
Community Writer for NEWS AND MESSENGER 
www.insidenova.com 

---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Learning Disabilities mailing list LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities Email delivered to andreawilder at comcast.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/learningdisabilities/attachments/20091104/3527bc4e/attachment.html