National Institute for Literacy
 

[PovertyRaceWomen 1516] Re: PovertyRaceWomen Digest, Vol 15, Issue 8

Katherine G Kgotthardt at comcast.net
Sat Jan 12 09:51:46 EST 2008


Too many people have become immune to or annoyed with the word "diversity."
They see it somehow as a "card" of any kind (racially related, disability
related, etc.) that doesn't hold credibility. I vote for a new word that
doesn't further irritate people with a word they think is just politically
correct rhetoric. "Ethnicity" covers the "color" thing. "Ability" and
"sexual identity" covers other aspects of what we think of in terms of
"diversity." I prefer the word "ability" because there is room there to
stress strengths and not just impairment.

Am I getting off topic?

Katherine Mercurio Gotthardt
www.luxuriouschoices.org
-----Original Message-----
From: povertyracewomen-bounces at nifl.gov
[mailto:povertyracewomen-bounces at nifl.gov]On Behalf Of Andrea Wilder
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:57 PM
To: The Poverty, Race,Women and Literacy Discussion List
Subject: [PovertyRaceWomen 1515] Re: PovertyRaceWomen Digest, Vol 15,
Issue 8


OK--more on the problem of "diversity;" no one knows what you mean (except
Black) unless you specify what you mean, so we might as well specify to
begin with--women? poor? etc etc.

Andrea
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Bertha Mo wrote:


As an anthropologist, I've learned that meaning is often dictated by
context and circumstances. I participate on list serves such as this one
just to enhance the meaning of the term "diversity."

Bertie Mo, Ph.D., MPH

povertyracewomen-request at nifl.gov wrote:

Send PovertyRaceWomen mailing list submissions to
povertyracewomen at nifl.gov

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
povertyracewomen-request at nifl.gov

You can reach the person managing the list at
povertyracewomen-owner at nifl.gov

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of PovertyRaceWomen digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. [PovertyRaceWomen 1509] Diversity and Literacy (Taylor, Jackie)
2. [PovertyRaceWomen 1509] Re: Diversity and Literacy (Andrea Wilder)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:46:40 -0500
From: "Taylor, Jackie"
Subject: [PovertyRaceWomen 1509] Diversity and Literacy
To:
Message-ID:
<0913EC48F2B05C4FBE4878BAFCABBFEC0176FD35 at KFSVS2.utk.tennessee.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

List friends,

I have been watching the discussion about the list name for the
Poverty,
Race, Women and Literacy List, and reviewing the options. A name
embraces who we are and what we are about. I'm wondering, are we
limiting ourselves by choosing a very descriptive name?



What about choosing a name that is fully inclusive of all groups that
find themselves on the margins? None of the names below really suggest
that except for "Diversity and Literacy" and "Literacy and Voice." If
the name were "Class, Color, Gender, and Literacy" I don't see how
that
would allow for discussions of the elderly and literacy, or of ableism
for example, the discrimination against those with disabilities. I
don't
believe we have postings purely on class, color, or gender.



The advantage of the name "Diversity and Literacy" is that it allows
for
the full range of topics that concern our community and the
intersection
of those topics, like the discussions occurring this week, for
example.



What do others think?



Jackie



Jackie Taylor, Adult Literacy Professional Development List Moderator,
jataylor at utk.edu



________________________________

Thanks to all the contributors who sent in ideas regarding the
possible
name change for our list. After reviewing the different possibilities
and discussing them with National Institute for Literacy staff, it
seems
as if the following names fit the most appropriately with the purpose
of
our discussion list (listed in alphabetical order):

Class, Color, Gender, and Literacy
Class, Ethnicity, Gender, and Literacy
Class, Gender, Race, and Literacy
Diversity and Literacy
Gender, Income, Race, and Literacy
Gender. Poverty, Race, and Literacy
Literacy and Voice

Or

Keeping it as is: Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy

It is completely up to us which of the above names we want to select.

Please be aware, that if we change the name of the list, we will need
to
create a new list. Current subscribers will be automatically
subscribed
to the new list. Each subscriber will receive a confirmation email
with
a new password and information about the list.

Here is what I am proposing. Between now and January 21, let us have a
discussion on the pros and cons of the various names above (please do
not suggest new names). Then between January 22nd and February 11th,
people can select their top choice (only one please) either on list or
off list to me (dgreenberg at gsu.edu
)

So who, would like to start the discussion by providing feedback on
the
pros/cons of any of the above names for our list?

Daphne

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/povertyracewomen/attachments/20080110/ff8ef3db
/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:10:18 -0500
From: Andrea Wilder
Subject: [PovertyRaceWomen 1509] Re: Diversity and Literacy
To: "The Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy Discussion List"

Message-ID: <1d6bb58cf46b2036caf52dbc03cf97b6 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi Jackie--

The problem with diversity : a euphemism for black. I find this
everywhere.

Andrea.


On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Taylor, Jackie wrote:

> List friends,
> I have been watching the discussion about the list name for the
> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy List, and reviewing the options. A
> name embraces who we are and what we are about. I?m wondering, are
we
> limiting ourselves by choosing a very descriptive name? ?
> ?
> What about choosing a name that is fully inclusive of all groups
that
> find themselves on the margins? None of the names below really
suggest
> that except for ?Diversity and Literacy? and ?Literacy and Voice.?
If
> the name were ?Class, Color, Gender, and Literacy? I don?t see how
> that would allow for discussions of the elderly and literacy, or of
> ableism for example, the discrimination against those with
> disabilities. I don?t believe we have postings purely on class,
color,
> or gender.
> ?
> The advantage of the name ?Diversity and Literacy? is that it allows
> for the full range of topics that concern our community and the
> intersection of those topics, like the discussions occurring this
> week, for example.
> ?
> What do others think?
> ?
> Jackie
> ?
> Jackie Taylor, Adult Literacy Professional Development List
Moderator,
> jataylor at utk.edu
> ?
>
> Thanks to all the contributors who sent in ideas regarding the
> possible name change for our list. After reviewing the different
> possibilities and discussing them with National Institute for
Literacy
> staff, it seems as if the following names fit the most appropriately
> with the purpose of our discussion list (listed in alphabetical
> order):
>
> Class, Color, Gender, and Literacy
> Class, Ethnicity, Gender, and Literacy
> Class, Gender, Race, and Literacy
> Diversity and Literacy
> Gender, Income, Race, and Literacy
> Gender. Poverty, Race, and Literacy
> Literacy and Voice
>
> Or
>
> Keeping it as is: Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy
>
> It is completely up to us which of the above names we want to
select.
>
> Please be aware, that if we change the name of the list, we will
need
> to create a new list. Current subscribers will be automatically
> subscribed to the new list. Each subscriber will receive a
> confirmation email with a new password and information about the
list.
>
> Here is what I am proposing. Between now and January 21, let us have
> a discussion on the pros and cons of the various names above (please
> do not suggest new names). Then between January 22nd and February
> 11th, people can select their top choice (only one please) either on
> list or off list to me (dgreenberg at gsu.edu)
>
> So who, would like to start the discussion by providing feedback on
> the pros/cons of any of the above names for our list?
>
> Daphne
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
> PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 6038 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/povertyracewomen/attachments/20080111/2121850e
/attachment-0001.bin

------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen

End of PovertyRaceWomen Digest, Vol 15, Issue 8
***********************************************

----------------------------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/povertyracewomen/attachments/20080112/851df99f/attachment.html


More information about the PovertyRaceWomen mailing list