[PovertyRaceWomen 2132] Re: Mastery
Andrea Wilder
andreawilder at comcast.net
Tue Apr 29 11:10:03 EDT 2008
Kathereine:
1) this was a need the village elders saw
2) the national government wasn't building schools.
3) Mortenson showed up with the necessary skills--cultural adaptation,
easy adoption of languages, ability to raise money, early life
experiences which had prepared the way for this type of action.
Andrea
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Katherine wrote:
> So you ladies don't think there is ANYTHING revolutionary about going
> back
> and opening a school? That's pretty radical in my mind. It's out of
> the
> ordinary. It's EXTRAORDINARY in fact.
>
> Katherine Mercurio Gotthardt
> www.luxuriouschoices.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrea Wilder" <andreawilder at comcast.net>
> To: "The Poverty, Race,Women and Literacy Discussion List"
> <povertyracewomen at nifl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 8:51 AM
> Subject: [PovertyRaceWomen 2124] Re: Mastery
>
>
>> Ujwala--
>>
>> Yes, he was extremely lucky. As I recall, the porter who rescued him
>> had knowledge of western ways, so Mortenson was somewhat understood,
>> as
>> a person and as an acceptable member of his western group--he was not
>> an oddball. There were other factors specific to Mortenson that
>> enabled him to do what he did--beyond luck, and having to do with his
>> background.
>>
>> He was also captured and (briefly) imprisoned when he did NOT follow
>> the rules. He got out of imprisonment when he DID follow the rules.
>>
>> Read the book.
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Ujwala Samant wrote:
>>
>>> Andrea,
>>>
>>> That's the book I am struggling to read, to get into.
>>> I give him full marks for adapting, that must have
>>> been extremely hard; given the mountains, the culture
>>> and the language. I also think he was extremely lucky
>>> to have found the welcome he received, given those
>>> areas.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Ujwala
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Andrea Wilder <andreawilder at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ujwala--
>>>>
>>>> Greg Mortenson of "Three Cups of Tea" succeeded
>>>> because he was able to
>>>> learn the rules, I think his story is pretty
>>>> dramatic; shows what can
>>>> be accomplished when some one has the diligence and
>>>> desire to learn how
>>>> to behave properly in order to get a job done.
>>>>
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 28, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Ujwala Samant wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just noted a typo my post. It should read, "We
>>>> call
>>>>> people by their first names." Or, "It's normal to
>>>> call
>>>>> people by their first names."
>>>>> Ujwala
>>>>> --- Daniel Rizik-Baer <drizikbaer at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ujwala-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "> I think everyone knows the hidden rules, they
>>>> are
>>>>>>> just not in plain site.
>>>>>>> Knowing that they are there is a big step
>>>> towards
>>>>>>> understanding.<<
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think there is a huge leap of faith in the
>>>> first
>>>>>> statement. Rules are learned, through
>>>> observation,
>>>>>> education and interaction. How many of our
>>>> learners
>>>>>> have positive, direct, educational interaction
>>>> upon
>>>>>> arrival? "We don't ask someone their age or
>>>> income."
>>>>>> comes to mind. "We don't call everyone by their
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> name." When asked "How're you doing?" it is not
>>>> an
>>>>>> invitation to discuss your state of mind or
>>>> being. I
>>>>>> could go on..... I think there are things to be
>>>>>> learned through interaction, and some through
>>>>>> teaching."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I meant is much closer to what you
>>>> described.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I mean is that people know the hidden rules,
>>>>>> and yet do not know that
>>>>>> they know them, Things as simple as which hand to
>>>>>> shake hands with, or many
>>>>>> other things that are cultural that may seem
>>>>>> "natural," but in fact are
>>>>>> socially constructed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So just as you said, rules are learned- but
>>>> people
>>>>>> learn them without really
>>>>>> realizing they are being socialized into a
>>>>>> particular culture.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is why I think it is so important for our
>>>> youth
>>>>>> to have the opportunity
>>>>>> for world travel- to see how other cultures
>>>> express
>>>>>> their humaness, to see
>>>>>> the simliarties and differences in how people
>>>> live
>>>>>> their lives may help our
>>>>>> youth to open their minds to see how their lives
>>>> are
>>>>>> socially constucted at
>>>>>> home.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like Katherine said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We don't ask someone their age or income."
>>>>>> comes to mind. "We don't call everyone by their
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> name." When asked "How're you doing?" it is not
>>>> an
>>>>>> invitation to discuss your state of mind or
>>>> being.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *I mean, if someone asks how you are, why should
>>>> you
>>>>>> hide how you are
>>>>>> feeling?
>>>>>> If I ask, don't I really want to know? If I
>>>> don't,
>>>>>> then I shouldn't bother
>>>>>> asking!*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well yes, if we took the statement at face value.
>>>>>> But imagine if for
>>>>>> everyone you said "how are you doing?" to, they
>>>>>> actually told you about
>>>>>> their life, allo the trials and tribulations etc.
>>>> We
>>>>>> would never get through
>>>>>> our day! It has become a greeting that means
>>>>>> "hello" while appearing to
>>>>>> show caring, which I do not think is necessarily
>>>> a
>>>>>> bad thing. Certain people
>>>>>> really do want to know- close friends and family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *True we don't call everyone by their first name,
>>>>>> but some of that depends
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> how they introduce themselves. If a stranger
>>>> shakes
>>>>>> my hand and says, "I'm
>>>>>> Jay Smith," then should I call him "Jay" or "Mr.
>>>>>> Smith"? And if he calls ME
>>>>>> by MY first name, shouldn't I assume I can do the
>>>>>> same thing in return?
>>>>>> These are questions I'm sure ESOL students have
>>>> (or
>>>>>> don't have).*
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> I think this is a great example, especially
>>>> because
>>>>>> so many high schol
>>>>>> teachers and college professors from the 60's on
>>>> up
>>>>>> have attempted to break
>>>>>> down the academic/superiority "rules" created by
>>>>>> calling them by their last
>>>>>> names by asking their students to call them by
>>>> their
>>>>>> first names. A perfect
>>>>>> exaqmple of people breaking social rules on
>>>> purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A cultural rule that has been legalized is how
>>>>>> people attain their last
>>>>>> names. Did you know that for a woman to change
>>>> her
>>>>>> last name to her
>>>>>> husband's name, it costs under $100, but for a
>>>> man
>>>>>> to change his last name
>>>>>> to his wife's last name costs more than $300.
>>>> These
>>>>>> are rules left over from
>>>>>> before women had the right to vote!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Katherine
>>>>>> <kgotthardt at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "We don't ask someone their age or income."
>>>>>>> comes to mind. "We don't call everyone by their
>>>>>> first
>>>>>>> name." When asked "How're you doing?" it is not
>>>> an
>>>>>>> invitation to discuss your state of mind or
>>>> being.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But don't you think that's sad (except the
>>>> income
>>>>>> question in certain
>>>>>>> work-related contexts where you are usually told
>>>>>> not to discuss income)?
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> mean, if someone asks how you are, why should
>>>> you
>>>>>> hide how you are
>>>>>>> feeling?
>>>>>>> If I ask, don't I really want to know? If I
>>>>>> don't, then I shouldn't
>>>>>>> bother
>>>>>>> asking! If someone asks me to buy something and
>>>>>> I'm broke, what is wrong
>>>>>>> with saying, "Sorry, but I'm broke?" We're so
>>>> up
>>>>>> tight and often
>>>>>>> dishonest
>>>>>>> in this culture. (I'm back to the "hypocrite"
>>>>>> thing, as you can tell.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True we don't call everyone by their first name,
>>>>>> but some of that depends
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> how they introduce themselves. If a stranger
>>>>
>>> === message truncated ===
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>> __
>>> _____________
>>> Be a better friend, newshound, and
>>> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>>> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>> National Institute for Literacy
>>> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
>>> PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
>>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
>>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
>>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> National Institute for Literacy
>> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
>> PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
>> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
>> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
> PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
>
More information about the PovertyRaceWomen
mailing list