[PovertyRaceWomen 2136] Re: Mastery
Andrea Wilder
andreawilder at comcast.net
Tue Apr 29 11:17:32 EDT 2008
Ujwala--
I understand your point, and I went to hear him talk with what you say
in mind--was this guy a phony? Was the story too good? I joined the
line of people who asked him to sign the book. I asked him a couple
of questions--he was completely exhausted, barely able to write, or
talk, and had the chubbiness alluded to by his wife--he doesn't take
good care of himself, and he used to be a hiker and climber. I think
he is the real deal. This is as of April 29, 2008.
Love your comments--
Andrea
On Apr 29, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Ujwala Samant wrote:
> Andrea,
>
> I find the book difficult reading, almost self
> aggrandizing. I can't be fussed. Maybe another time, I
> will pick it up again. It is better reading than say
> that awful Bookseller of Kabul. Now that's a book for
> lining bird cages and trying the author for sheer
> unadulterated racism.
>
> It's good that he got out of prison for following the
> rules.
> Cheers
> Ujwala
>
>
>
>
> --- Andrea Wilder <andreawilder at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Ujwala--
>>
>> Yes, he was extremely lucky. As I recall, the
>> porter who rescued him
>> had knowledge of western ways, so Mortenson was
>> somewhat understood, as
>> a person and as an acceptable member of his western
>> group--he was not
>> an oddball. There were other factors specific to
>> Mortenson that
>> enabled him to do what he did--beyond luck, and
>> having to do with his
>> background.
>>
>> He was also captured and (briefly) imprisoned when
>> he did NOT follow
>> the rules. He got out of imprisonment when he DID
>> follow the rules.
>>
>> Read the book.
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:29 AM, Ujwala Samant wrote:
>>
>>> Andrea,
>>>
>>> That's the book I am struggling to read, to get
>> into.
>>> I give him full marks for adapting, that must have
>>> been extremely hard; given the mountains, the
>> culture
>>> and the language. I also think he was extremely
>> lucky
>>> to have found the welcome he received, given those
>>> areas.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Ujwala
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Andrea Wilder <andreawilder at comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ujwala--
>>>>
>>>> Greg Mortenson of "Three Cups of Tea" succeeded
>>>> because he was able to
>>>> learn the rules, I think his story is pretty
>>>> dramatic; shows what can
>>>> be accomplished when some one has the diligence
>> and
>>>> desire to learn how
>>>> to behave properly in order to get a job done.
>>>>
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 28, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Ujwala Samant wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just noted a typo my post. It should read, "We
>>>> call
>>>>> people by their first names." Or, "It's normal
>> to
>>>> call
>>>>> people by their first names."
>>>>> Ujwala
>>>>> --- Daniel Rizik-Baer <drizikbaer at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ujwala-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "> I think everyone knows the hidden rules,
>> they
>>>> are
>>>>>>> just not in plain site.
>>>>>>> Knowing that they are there is a big step
>>>> towards
>>>>>>> understanding.<<
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think there is a huge leap of faith in the
>>>> first
>>>>>> statement. Rules are learned, through
>>>> observation,
>>>>>> education and interaction. How many of our
>>>> learners
>>>>>> have positive, direct, educational interaction
>>>> upon
>>>>>> arrival? "We don't ask someone their age or
>>>> income."
>>>>>> comes to mind. "We don't call everyone by their
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> name." When asked "How're you doing?" it is not
>>>> an
>>>>>> invitation to discuss your state of mind or
>>>> being. I
>>>>>> could go on..... I think there are things to be
>>>>>> learned through interaction, and some through
>>>>>> teaching."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I meant is much closer to what you
>>>> described.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I mean is that people know the hidden
>> rules,
>>>>>> and yet do not know that
>>>>>> they know them, Things as simple as which hand
>> to
>>>>>> shake hands with, or many
>>>>>> other things that are cultural that may seem
>>>>>> "natural," but in fact are
>>>>>> socially constructed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So just as you said, rules are learned- but
>>>> people
>>>>>> learn them without really
>>>>>> realizing they are being socialized into a
>>>>>> particular culture.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is why I think it is so important for our
>>>> youth
>>>>>> to have the opportunity
>>>>>> for world travel- to see how other cultures
>>>> express
>>>>>> their humaness, to see
>>>>>> the simliarties and differences in how people
>>>> live
>>>>>> their lives may help our
>>>>>> youth to open their minds to see how their
>> lives
>>>> are
>>>>>> socially constucted at
>>>>>> home.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like Katherine said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "We don't ask someone their age or income."
>>>>>> comes to mind. "We don't call everyone by their
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> name." When asked "How're you doing?" it is not
>>>> an
>>>>>> invitation to discuss your state of mind or
>>>> being.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *I mean, if someone asks how you are, why
>> should
>>>> you
>>>>>> hide how you are
>>>>>> feeling?
>>>>>> If I ask, don't I really want to know? If I
>>>> don't,
>>>>>> then I shouldn't bother
>>>>>> asking!*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well yes, if we took the statement at face
>> value.
>>>>>> But imagine if for
>>>>>> everyone you said "how are you doing?" to, they
>>>>>> actually told you about
>>>>>> their life, allo the trials and tribulations
>> etc.
>>>> We
>>>>>> would never get through
>>>>>> our day! It has become a greeting that means
>>>>>> "hello" while appearing to
>>>>>> show caring, which I do not think is
>> necessarily
>>>> a
>>>>>> bad thing. Certain people
>>>>>> really do want to know- close friends and
>> family.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *True we don't call everyone by their first
>> name,
>>>>>> but some of that depends
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> how they introduce themselves. If a stranger
>>>> shakes
>>>>>> my hand and says, "I'm
>>>>>> Jay Smith," then should I call him "Jay" or
>> "Mr.
>>>>>> Smith"? And if he calls ME
>>>>>> by MY first name, shouldn't I assume I can do
>> the
>>>>>> same thing in return?
>>>>>> These are questions I'm sure ESOL students have
>>>> (or
>>>>>> don't have).*
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> I think this is a great example, especially
>>>> because
>>>>>> so many high schol
>>>>>> teachers and college professors from the 60's
>> on
>>>> up
>>>>>> have attempted to break
>>>>>> down the academic/superiority "rules" created
>> by
>>>>>> calling them by their last
>>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> _____________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> ----------------------------------------------------
> National Institute for Literacy
> Poverty, Race, Women and Literacy mailing list
> PovertyRaceWomen at nifl.gov
> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/povertyracewomen
>
More information about the PovertyRaceWomen
mailing list