[ProfessionalDevelopment 1341] 2 Upcoming Discussions! PD Research and Assessment AnnouncementsTaylor, Jackie jataylor at utk.eduFri Jul 6 13:08:15 EDT 2007
PD List Colleagues: Below is a copy of the upcoming PD Research discussion announcement you may wish to share with teachers in your area. I've also included a _second_ discussion announcement also coming up next week but on the Assessment List. Please see below. Part I is an overview; Part II provides discussion details. ~ Jackie Taylor, Adult Literacy Professional Development List Moderator, jataylor at utk.edu Part I 1) Title: Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education http://tinyurl.com/yvuvzr Date: July 9-13, 2007 Resource for Discussion: http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pdf Guests: Marilyn Gillespie and Cristine Smith http://tinyurl.com/2bpyap To participate, subscribe: http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Professionaldevelopment To submit questions for discussion, email: jataylor at utk.edu 2) Title: Assessment in Distance Learning Date: July 9-13, 2007 Guests: Jennifer Rafferty and Shannon Young To participate, subscribe: http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Assessment To submit questions, email: marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com Part II 1) Title: Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education http://tinyurl.com/yvuvzr Date: July 9-13, 2007 Resource for Discussion: http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pdf To participate, subscribe: http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Professionaldevelopment To submit questions for discussion, email: jataylor at utk.edu Guests: http://tinyurl.com/2bpyap Marilyn Gillespie, Ed.D., Senior Educational Researcher, Center for Education Policy, SRI International Marilyn Gillespie conducts research and evaluation in adult literacy and K-12 education for federal and state organizations and foundations. Cristine Smith, Ed.D., Assistant Professor, Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Cristine Smith was the director of NCSALL's five-year study on professional development for adult literacy teachers. Description: Historically, very little research has been conducted in adult literacy professional development. Recently, the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy (NCSALL) has published a chapter within the Review of Adult Learning and Literacy (v. 7) on research in professional development and teacher change <http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pd f> . This chapter (available free and online) draws from the NCSALL Professional Development Study as well as research on professional development from the K-12 field. Join the Adult Literacy Professional Development Discussion List where the authors, Cristine Smith and Marilyn Gillespie, will participate with subscribers in discussion on teacher professional development issues like: * What is known about what makes teacher professional development effective * How teachers change as a result of professional development * Implications for policy, practice and research in professional development * How the Association of Adult Literacy Professional Developers (AALPD) can take action to: a. Develop a centralized location for professional development research, and b. Advance research in adult literacy professional development. ************************************************ Preparation for PD Research Discussion The following questions are just a few questions to inspire discussion. You may have different questions. Feel free to post your questions to the PD List or email them direct to jataylor at utk.edu . Please reflect on your answers to any of the following... Overall: 1) From your experience, what has been the most effective professional development in which you have participated? What factors made it most valuable for your professional growth and learning? 2) What aspects of the chapter on professional development research stood out to you most? Why? 3) What are the similarities and notable differences between K-12 and adult literacy education professional development? Lessons Learned 4) Given the lessons learned from the NCSALL Professional Development Study and PD research in general, are these understandings being translated into the professional development our field is offering teachers? For example: a. Is more teacher training involving both the program administrator and teacher? b. Are you seeing more follow-up on-site? c. Is there less of a focus in the field on single-session workshops and more on program-based, job-embedded, or hybrid models of professional development? State of Research 5) What are the differences in K-12 and adult literacy professional development research needs? 6) What kinds of research in adult literacy professional development are most needed? Funding: 7) How are states currently funding professional development research? What are potential ways in which states may fund PD research, such as collaborating with neighboring states to address common PD research questions of concern? Professional Development Models 8) On-site professional development vs. the regional or state workshop model: What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Single-Session Professional Development - Exception vs. Norm 9) The authors note that one implication for practice from professional development research is that states should make single-session workshops the exception rather than the norm. Do you agree? Why or why not? 10) What are other options for increasing professional development designs that offer longer term, more job-embedded models of professional development? Teacher Working Conditions 11) Authors discuss what researchers call the "dilution effect" of professional development: The actual impact of the professional development is diluted by all of the other factors that support or hinder teachers from making change. a. How do teachers' working conditions (such as paid prep time or benefits) relate to their ability to make use of the professional development they receive? b. Is improving teacher working conditions a concern that can only be addressed at the local level? Why or why not? c. What work is being done to improve teacher working conditions in programs and states? What has changed since the advent of the NCSALL Professional Development Study, specifically pertaining to teacher working conditions? Have we "taken the lesson home?" To heart? The Role of the School Administrator in Teacher Professional Development 12) How do program directors support and/or constrain teacher change? Using Student Data to Improve Instruction 13) What work is being done in using student achievement data to improve teaching practice? Teacher Turnover 14) Is teacher turnover higher in adult education than in K-12? What are the factors that cause teachers to leave the field of adult education? What are the implications of high teacher turnover for our students, for our field? Serve More Students or Serve Fewer, Better? 15) From your experience, share your perspective on the issue about the extent to which research-based professional development should be more heavily invested. For example, given that research indicates that working conditions, such as access to benefits and paid preparation time for ABE teachers, may actually influence the effectiveness of professional development, should policy makers consider whether any increase in funding be channeled into such expenditures, even if fewer students are served as a result? 16) The annual average cost per adult education student in states is $800.00. In many states, this cost is much lower. Should it cost more to teach adult education students? Why or why not? 17) What other issues may arise in the quantity versus quality debate? 2) Title: Assessment in Distance Learning Date: July 9-13, 2007 Guests: Jennifer Rafferty and Shannon Young To participate, subscribe: http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Assessment To submit questions, email: marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com Discussion Announcement To subscribe to this discussion, please go to: http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/Assessment Dear Colleagues, I'm pleased to announce the following Guest Discussion, which will be held during the week of July 9 (next week!!): Topic: Assessment in Distance Learning Guest Participants: Jennifer Rafferty currently works as an independent education consultant. Formerly, she worked at the Adult Literacy Resource Institute at SABES Boston where she held the role of Project Manager for the Massachusetts ABE Distance Learning Project. She has worked in the field of ABE since 1998. Shannon Young is the Program Manager for the Support Center at Project IDEAL / AdultEd Online and is a Senior Research Area Specialist for the Program on Teaching, Learning, & Technology at The University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research. She oversees the Center's work on curriculum and assessment issues and leads the design team that creates online tools used to collect student data and support teachers in member states. Shannon has conducted education research in k-12 and ABE settings and been a tutor and writing instructor since 1991. Recommended preparations for this discussion: Please consider any of the following questions as catalysts for discussion. There is some redundancy with the questions below; however, the questions are articulated slightly differently and so might provide people with different entry points of thought. Also, perhaps subscribers will find it interesting to view Massachusetts as a sort of case study given that the issues faced there appear to mirror the issues faced elsewhere in Distance Learning. Measures of Progress-Informal and Ongoing In the discussion on pre-assessments for online learning (see Resources of Interest, below), participants talked about the ways in which they use various pre-assessments, orientation activities, and technology training to gauge readiness and prepare their students to become distance learners who persist beyond the "try-out" phase. In distance learning, the initial orientation period may be one of the few times teachers and students are face to face. The types of informal, ongoing assessments teachers routinely use in classrooms (e.g., "reading" students to determine comprehension, redirecting or expanding discussions, group activities, quizzes, etc.) frequently aren't available in a distance setting. So, once we have students in the distance-learning door, how can we use progress measures and informal assessments to help keep them engaged? What do those measures entail? What does and doesn't work and why? What role might partner agencies and/or interested "others" play in the assessment process and in helping students stay connected and engaged? As a distance teacher, how do you use the results of progress measures to inform your teaching? Post-Testing and the NRS In June, the NRS posted its official guidelines for counting distance learners in the NRS tables. One of the guidelines for counting distance learners states that students be post-tested in a proctored setting using a standardized assessment at intervals designated by the test developer or by state policy. Some states follow test developer guidelines. Others mandate students be post-tested after a certain number of days. * How do you get your distance learners to take standardized post-tests? * How do you prepare them in advance to understand the necessity of post-testing? * What sorts of partnerships have you formed with other service providers (e.g., libraries, career link centers, etc.) to handle post-testing distance learners? What advice would you have for others interested in forming these partnerships? * What do you do when a student achieves his/her goal before the pre-determined post-test interval? For example, many students come into distance programs with specific, short-term goals and study intently for brief periods of time (e.g., 50 hours of study over a two-week period). They meet their objectives and are ready to exit a program. If they have not been designated as a project-based learner, how do you handle accounting for these students? Do you post-test even if they haven't met the pre-established time-based criteria? The following questions are based on discussions that have come up with distance learning programs in Massachusetts: Questions related to standardized assessments, NRS, and state assessment policies: 1. What standardized testing instruments do you use with distance learners in your state? 2. Are your distance learning programs required to follow assessment policies/guidelines that were created for classroom programs, or has your state developed a separate set of distance learning assessment policies? 3. Do the standardized assessments align well with the dl curricula being used in your state? 4. How successful has your program been with pre and post assessment of distance learners? 5. What strategies have you implemented to encourage learners to return for a post-test and which strategies have been the most successful? 6. Has your state developed any remote testing guidelines that would make it easier for learners to access required assessments without having to return to the adult learning program? 7. Does your state use a standardized assessment that is online/web-based? If so, has having a web-based assessment made it easier for your program to pre and post-test learners? Questions related to other forms of assessment for dl programs: What other assessment instruments do you use to gauge whether your learners are appropriate for distance learning delivery? Do you think that these assessments give a good indication as to whether or not the learner is prepared for self-directed learning? What skills needed for dl are not so easily evaluated with inventories and assessments? Resources of interest: Project IDEAL (Improving Distance Education for Adult Learners): http://projectideal.org AdultEdOnline: http://www.adultedonline.org (Introduction to distance teaching and free online self-assessment for classroom teachers interested in becoming a distance teacher) "Pre-Assessments for On-Line Learning"; Excerpt from Special Topics Community Literacy discussion; go to: http://dev.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/assessment/07assess_distance_1.htm l The discussion begins with questions regarding early drop-out and retention issues and asks whether "try-out periods" are integral to on-line learning processes. It then focuses on the inclusion of pre-assessments, as well as pre- and on-going orientation sessions as strategies for improving retention and success rates. Marie Cora marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com <mailto:marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com> NIFL Assessment Discussion List Moderator http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment Coordinator, LINCS Assessment Special Collection http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20070706/4365b931/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |