National Institute for Literacy
 

[ProfessionalDevelopment 1779] Re: AALPD: Please post feedback by Dec. 7th

mev at litwomen.org mev at litwomen.org
Thu Dec 6 10:39:37 EST 2007


I haven't had a chance to read all the posts, so I hope my comments
are not duplicative...but...

hmmmm - how to say this...

I know we want the standards to be relatively broad stroke -- and I
think including UDL is important (and often overlooked). But I'm a
little concerned that in all our speak of "all learners," varieties
of approaches and methods and building collaborations, adult learning
priorities, etc., we maybe diluting too much.

I am especially concerned about #2. It seems the only conversation
about supportive environments underscores the need for Universal
design. (There have been a couple of questions about the definition
of universal design and the only "response" I've seen is the
reference to a CALPRO fact sheet.) But I don't believe the UDL will
necessarily get to the other critical realities of adult basic ed --
that we are working with populations disadvantaged by systemic
oppressions based on race, class, gender, sexualities, culture,
language, ethnicity -- as well as disabilities and age, etc.

I'm not sure what the language should be -- and I don't think that
"PD providers use differentiated instruction to meet the needs of all
learners" really gets at this. Perhaps the word-smithers can help
here -- but in addition to UDL, I'd like to see some additional
language that explicitly refers to PD that assists and supports
practitioners learn more in depth about diversities, recognize and
address privileged learning environments and also to handle & mediate
conflicts that arise among students and practitioners....so that we
can truly and meaningfully get to the broader stoke sentiments of
"all learners" and "variety of methods."

and to #9 -- I would add "Resource Collections" -- those could be
lending libraries, websites, etc.

Mev Miller
WE LEARN
welearn at litwomen.org


On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Taylor, Jackie wrote:


> PD List Colleagues:

>

> We have two days left to discuss the draft AALPD PD Standards.

> Please post your comments by Friday, December 7th.

>

>

>

> To see what feedback has offered so far, visit:

>

>

>

> http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/Feedback_on_AALPD_Standards

>

>

>

> To find all discussion threads from our quality professional

> development discussion, visit:

>

>

>

> http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/

> Quality_Professional_Development

>

>

>

> For a copy of the draft AALPD PD standards, visit:

>

>

>

> http://www.aalpd.org/AALPDStandardsandIndicatorscombined11-06-07.doc

>

>

>

>

>

> Your reflections and feedback can only help us to improve the draft

> standards. I hope you’ll share your thoughts this week. I look

> forward to hearing from you.

>

>

>

> Thanks so much, Jackie

>

>

>

> Jackie Taylor, List Moderator, jataylor at utk.edu

>

>

>

>

>

> ----------------------------------------------------

> National Institute for Literacy

> Adult Literacy Professional Development mailing list

> professionaldevelopment at nifl.gov

>

> To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

> http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/professionaldevelopment

>

> Email delivered to mev at litwomen.org

>

> Professional Development section of the Adult Literacy Education Wiki

> http://wiki.literacytent.org/index.php/

> Adult_Literacy_Professional_Development


Mev Miller, Ed.D., Director
welearn at litwomen.org

WE LEARN
Women Expanding: Literacy Education Action Resource Network
www.litwomen.org/welearn.html

182 Riverside Ave.
Cranston, RI 02910
401-383-4374




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20071206/fd05f1e7/attachment.html


More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list