PD List Colleagues:

Please post your feedback to the draft AALPD PD Standards by the end of
the day today (Friday, Dec. 7th). Don't worry if you've not had a chance
to read or keep up with the feedback thus far. Now is the time to make
your views known. If something happens to be reiterated more than once,
it will serve to underscore the point.

http://www.aalpd.org/AALPDStandardsandIndicatorscombined11-06-07.doc 

You might wish to consider responding to one or more of the following
prompts:

*	What are the most important PD standards or indicators from your
perspective? 
*	What are the most important standards to advance PD in your
area/state? 
*	What PD Standards would be easy to implement? 
*	What would be hard to implement? 
*	Is there anything missing? 
*	Is there anything that isn't clear? 
*	Are the proposed standards too general? Which ones? All of them?
*	Are they too specific, too prescriptive? Which ones? 
*	The question of whether or not to have professional development
standards is still open. Are there good reasons not to have them? Are
there good reasons to have them? 
*	Do you think some or all of the proposed standards would advance
the field, help to improve teaching and learning? If so, which standards
would advance the field? 
*	What would need to be in place in order to make these standards
possible? 

Thanks again to all who have taken the time to offer responses. Your
feedback is important to AALPD.

 

Best wishes, Jackie

 

Jackie Taylor, PD List Moderator, jataylor at utk.edu 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20071207/fc09dd80/attachment.html